Chapter 2

The Southwest Silk Road: Yunnan in a Global Context

Introduction

1Until 1800 China was arguably the center of the enormous region of East Asia. While deserts, mountains, jungles, and seas, from northwest and southwest to the south, seemed to pose daunting challenges for even the most intrepid traveler, the discoveries of the Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Road have challenged the notion that the geographic hurdles left China isolated. While contributing a great deal to the understanding of ancient East-West exchanges, studies of the above two silk routes have overshadowed the third route, the so-called Southwest Silk Road connecting China, mainland Southeast Asia, India, and beyond.1 Studies of this third, relatively unknown route shed new light on the economic and military transactions and histories and cultures that developed in this part of the frontier.

2The earliest textual source identifying the Silk Road comes from Zhang Qian's exploration (138 BCE–126 BCE) of the Western Region (xiyu), which is recorded by Sima Qian in Shi Ji. But Zhang Qian's report indeed alludes to another Silk Road that connects Southwest China with India, when he found Sichuan cloth (shubu) and bamboo cane (qiongzhu) in Daxia (Bactria). Chinese historical writings prior to the Tang Dynasty (618–907), fragmentary and obscure as they are, also refer mysteriously to exchanges between China and Southeast Asia, even when nobody had reportedly completed the journey. At the turn of the twentieth century, sinologists such as Paul Pelliot devoted a great deal of energy to this matter of the passage.

3It was during World War II that Chinese scholars began further exploration. The year 1941 saw two articles on this route by Fang Guoyu and Gu Chunfan, the former written in Chinese and the latter in English.2 Seven years later, the first monograph by Xia Guangnan was published.3 From then until the 1980s, the study of this route stagnated, occasionally occupying only a tiny space in books on ancient Indian or Chinese civilization. Joseph Needham noticed this road, but his conclusion was based on the acceptance of Chinese texts.4 Scholars of India or South Asia at times mentioned the early trade between China and India via Burma. D. P. Singhal in his India and World Civilization, for instance, mentioned both overland routes through Nepal and Tibet to China, and through Assam and Upper Burma to Yunnan.5 Yu Yingshi's study on the trade of Han China did present a refined argument of the existence of the route. Nevertheless, limited by the nature of his study and by the lack of more recent archaeological discoveries, the whole picture remained incomplete.6

4Since the 1980s, scholars in China have spent tremendous efforts on this previously underestimated or neglected road. Dozens of books and articles have been counted, but many problems remain unsolved.7 Despite the abundance of Chinese sources, few could locate routes in non-Chinese regions such as Burma and Assam. What was the volume of trade? Little accurate information exists. When did the route begin to take shape? Many conflicting opinions have been generated. Even an agreement on the name of the road has not yet been reached. Some use Xi'nan Sichou Zhilu (Southwest Silk Road) or Nanfang Sichou Zhilu (South Silk Road), while others prefer the more descriptive Nanfang Lushang Zhilu (southern overland route) or Dianmianyin Gudao (ancient roads connecting Yunnan, Burma, and India). Some employ the traditional name, Shuyandu Dao (road between Sichuan and India), and others Shubu Zhilu (the road of Shu cloth), and still others do not give a specific name. I use Southwest Silk Road (SSR) to distinguish it from the North Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Road.8

5While Chinese scholars have furthered this study, their weaknesses have been as outstanding as their achievements. Many works were case studies that provided details but failed to draw a comprehensive picture. A few macrostudies, however, were based on Chinese sources—mainly Han texts—and could not escape from the accusation of Sino-centricism.9 Sun Laichen, in his innovative work on overland exchanges of military technology between Southeast Asia and Ming China, criticizes previous scholarship for its lack of breadth and depth:

First, they lack breadth as they fail to treat the Sino-Southeast Asian overland interactions as a whole. Second, they lack depth because they are, by and large, descriptive rather than analytical. Third, the sources materials utilized in most of these works are largely Chinese, while Southeast Asian sources are ignored. Thus the perspective adopted is usually 'looking down south' from China and is inevitably Sinocentric.10

I would like to further this critique. Previous studies indeed lack a global view and thus downplay the global significance of the Southwest Silk Road. A global perspective of the SSR will give rise to many questions, such as: What kind of relationship had existed among the three Silk Roads? How did they function together temporally and spatially? Did they become a network linked so closely that they brought the Eurasian supercontinent into a world system? If so, when and how? If not, why not? Janice Stargardt's study on medieval Burma and Sun Laichen's research have established excellent cases in terms of interactions between the overland route and the Maritime Silk Road, each with their own specific time frames.11 I cannot help questioning those early times, and thinking about the triangular interactions among the three roads.

6This chapter explores the significance of Yunnan in Eurasian communications by focusing on the Southwest Silk Road. I intend to supplement Chinese scholarship with non-Chinese resources to draw a more comprehensive picture of the SSR. First, I will present geographic and historical maps of the road, which is expected to fill in the gap of the pre–mid-nineteenth-century international trade that is less known to some scholars.12 Furthermore, I argue that this road, while having a great influence on shaping discussed regions, combined with the other two Silk Roads, provided a systematic trade network within which the three roads functioned in a complementary fashion. This chapter to some extent adds new dimensions to our existing understanding of East-West communications as I attempt to demonstrate Yunnan's many connections with neighboring peoples as well as its significance in world history.

Historical Yunnan: Crossroad of China, Southeast Asia, South Asia, and Tibet

7Yunnan encompasses a wide variety of natural conditions, characterized by mountains, rivers, gorges, plateaus, valleys, basins, forests, grasslands, and lakes. The Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau is the southern extension of the Tibetan Plateau, "the roof of the world." Principal mountains in Yunnan converge in northwest and from there they fan out southward and southwestward. Although diverse and harsh, Yunnan topography creates favorable and special environmental factors to build a cornerstone for its civilized societies. Among mountains and rivers are hundreds of small fertile basins and valleys that are called bazi. Their size varies from a couple of square kilometers to several hundred square kilometers. Held by mountains and in many cases nurtured by rivers, they are endowed with flat and fertile soils, thanks to the alluvial accumulation from rivers and rains. Even though they only constitute six percent of Yunnan territory, bazi are the key to its economy and culture.

8The bazi served as the base for an agricultural economy. The Dian Lake (dianchi) region and the Erhai Region are two of the largest bazi and have cultivated the most developed agriculture. It is in such ecological conditions that the two large modern-day cities, Dali and Kunming, have developed into urban centers of Yunnan. Furthermore, bazi facilitated connections and interactions among local peoples. Relatively short distances between those bazi made transportation and commercial activities plausible. Indeed, bazi functioned as inns for merchants, providing food and housing. Bazi were also providers of commercial goods, and consumers of foreign products. If we examine maps carefully, we find that cross-regional trade routes are chained with strings of bazi. Finally, bazi in Yunnan differ by altitude, landscape, and climate, which to a certain extent accounts for the diversity of local ethnic groups. In a word, bazi symbolize the dynamic and diverse Yunnan society.

9Rivers in Yunnan are of great interest. When we examine mainland Southeast Asia, we find that its major rivers (the Mekong, Red [or Hong], Salween, and Irrawaddy rivers) nurturing fertile lands all originated on the Tibet Plateau and passed through Yunnan. If we broaden our view, other major rivers such as the Yangzi, the Pearl (zhu), and the Brahmaputra share the same origin, either passing through the Yunnan Plateau or winding around its edges. Although most rivers in Yunnan are not navigable,13 and overland roads were so crucial for communication with neighbors, Charles Higham points out that these rivers "have historically provided passages for the movement of people, goods, and ideas."14

10Higham's conclusion is based on many archaeological and anthropological findings. Paleolithic and Neolithic discoveries reveal that Yunnan began to cultivate its own cultures during its interactions with neighboring areas. Scholars of China have used and, indeed, abused, archaeological findings in Yunnan to reconstruct Chinese national history. They have used hominid fossils unearthed in Yunnan to suggest the "likelihood that the Asian continent constitutes a locus for the origin of man."15 Some of them believe that the Homo erectus yuanmouensis found in Yuanmou County (Yunnan) is dated at approximately 1.7 million years,16 and were thus the earliest human beings in the land later called China. As archaeology has been a source for nationalist expression in present-day China, these scholars have come to conclude that the "Chinese of the recent day are the descendants of the region's Paleolithic inhabitants."17 This Sinocentric claim to Yunnan's archeological riches suggests the extent to which China's sense of heritage and national pride comes from Yunnan.

11Due to its geographic location, however, Yunnan has had closer ethnic and cultural associations with Southeast Asia. Ling Chunsheng has listed fifty common cultural features among Southeast Asian peoples, such as a patronymic system (fuzi lianming zhi), secondary burial/bone-cleaning burial (xiguzang), cliff burial (yazang), pile building (ganlan), and tattoos (wenshen). These customs have been found from the Pacific to Madagascar.18 For example, bronze drums have been found in Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, and Yunnan, although arguments about the origin and routes of diffusion continue. All of these probably resulted from prehistorical migrations of which scholars know very little.19 Considering these facts, more and more scholars tend to put ancient Yunnan into the category of Southeast Asia rather than East Asia.20 So, what was the role of Yunnan in the origin and development of Southeast Asian civilization?

12As a major intersection of Southeast Asia, East Asia, and Central Asia, Yunnan witnessed and participated in the early migrations in the region. Some peoples in Yunnan today are the descendents of the Di and Qiang who lived in Northwest China and later moved southward. Fei Xiaotong and other Chinese ethnologists thought highly of the corridor along the Tibetan plateau that connected Central Asia and Northwest China with Southwest China and mainland Southeast Asia. They named it the Ethnic Corridor (minzu zoulang) and argued that a full understanding of early migration through this pass would shed light on many myths of ethnicity, language, and ritual around Yunnan.21 The influence of the Di and Qiang nomadic culture was evident in Neolithic relics in Yunnan, revealing the close relationship among Yunnan, Tibet, and Central Asia.22

13But northern influence did not stop in Yunnan. Tong Enzheng points out that many cultural features in Southeast Asia might have come from Sichuan, having passed through Yunnan.23 For example, the bronze culture in Sanxingdui (Sichuan) came about before the Dong Son bronze culture that Vietnamese scholars claim had an effect on South China.24 Higham has paralleled ancient civilizations represented by the Sanxingdui and the Yin ruins and concludes that in the middle of the second millennium BCE these communities "were already displaying a mastery of bronze casting which was unsurpassed in the ancient world."25 Instead of claiming its local origins, he favors the possibility that "the Southeast Asian tradition of copper-based metallurgy was initially stimulated by the spread of ideas and goods down the very rivers which introduced the rice farming groups a millennium or so earlier."26 Although Higham indicates Lingnan as a corridor spreading ideas and technology, I would like to contend that Yunnan was also a possible connection, partially because Yunnan held major tin resources in the late first millennium BCE.

14Yunnan also made cultural contributions to Southeast Asia. Bronze drums, for instance, seem to have spread from Yunnan into Southeast Asia, because those unearthed in Yunnan were dated earlier than their Southeast Asian counterparts.27 Constituent analysis of these materials suggests that their metal was mined in Yunnan.28 Other archaeological findings such as beads and collard disc-rings support the ancient connections between these two areas, which are symbolized by the spread of bronze drums.29

15While the intimate relationships between Yunnan and China and between Yunnan and Southeast Asia should not be underestimated, one should bear in mind that other cultural relationships are crucial to Yunnan as well. Tibet, for instance, has been interacting with Yunnan since very early times. In fact, the Tubo Empire once established a tributary relationship with the Nanzhao Kingdom, and ethnic people such as the Naxi in northwest Yunnan have been heavily influenced by Tibetan culture. Furthermore, the Indian world had great influence on Yunnan as well, directly and indirectly. The most revealing cases include Buddhist influences and the cowry monetary system that will be discussed later.

16Yunnan also possessed its own creative energy, which it contributed to its neighbors. While bronze artifacts in the Shang and Zhou dynasties in the Central Plain have impressed the world, scholars have been puzzled by the source of their bronze, since no large copper sites existed in North China. Arnold Toynbee implies that the metal was from the south, since "the nearest sources of tin and copper to the Yellow River basin are Malaya and Yunnan."30 Recent chemical analyses have partially confirmed his speculation that copper was mined and moved from Yunnan.31 Also, it seems to have been processed in Yunnan before being transported away.32 Although the bronze culture in Yunnan cannot be compared with the Yin ruins or the Sanxingdui site, Zhang Zengqi points out that both Neolithic and bronze culture in Yunnan were original, distinctive, and replete with signs of local dynamics.33

17Yunnan also maintained connections with the Baiyue (a hundred Yue) peoples in the southeast coastal areas. The Yue people lived south of the Yangzi River and spread as far as Indochina. Some inhabitants in Yunnan belonged to the Baiyue. Archeological findings have affirmed common cultural features that have been discussed by Ling Chunsheng and other scholars, which are also supported with linguistic evidence.34

18In general, Yunnan has been variously linked with neighboring cultures since prehistoric times. Nanzhao Yeshi (The wild history of Nanzhao) compiled by Ni He, a Ming scholar, records a tenacious local legend that not only suggests their intimate ties with all the neighbors but also suggests local concepts of the world.35 According to this legend, the founder of Nanzhao was a grandson of Asoka of West Tianzhu (India). He had eight brothers, among whom, the eldest was the ancestor of the sixteen states (in ancient India); the second, the ancestor of Tubo (Tibet); the third, the ancestor of the Han people (China); the fourth, the ancestor of the Eastern Barbarians (dongman, probably referring to ethnic peoples in modern Guizhou); the fifth, namely, himself, the ancestor of the Mengshezhao (later Nanzhao); the sixth, the ancestor of the Lion Kingdom (Shiziguo, referring to Ceylon); the seventh, the ancestor of Jiaozhi (North Vietnam); the eighth, the ancestor of the Baizi Kingdom (a local kingdom replaced by Nanzhao); and the ninth, the ancestor of the Baiyi (the Tai people).36 Therefore, Nanzhao saw not only local peoples such as the Baizi Kingdom, the White Barbarians, and the Eastern Barbarians but also China, Tibet, Vietnam, Ceylon, and India as fraternal states, revealing a cross-boundary worldview comprising all the above peoples. Such a concept of the world must have been based on the frequent interactions enabled by the Southwest Silk Road.

General Overview of the Southwest Silk Road

19Geographic location rendered Yunnan an intersection, destination, and site of cultural interaction. Indeed, it constituted a land bridge between China and Southeast Asia, and beyond, but, unlike the North Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Road, the lack of textual and archaeological evidence challenges scholars to provide a comprehensive picture of the SSR, especially during its early period.

20It was Zhang Qian during his mission to the Western Region (138 BCE–126 BCE) who suspected the existence of the SSR. In Daxia (Bactria), Zhang Qian reported that he found Sichuanese items:

When I was in Daxia, I saw bamboo canes from Qiong and cloth made in the province of Shu. When I asked the people how they had obtained such articles, they told me, "Our merchants go to buy them in the markets of Yandu."37 Yandu lays several thousand li southeast of Daxia. Their customs are much like those of Daxia. The region is said to be hot and damp. The inhabitants ride elephants when they go into battle. The kingdom is situated on a great river. We know that Daxia is located twelve thousand li southwest of China. Now if the kingdom of Yandu is situated several thousand li southeast of Daxia and obtains Shu goods, it seems that Yandu must not be very far away from Shu. Now an envoy to Daxia by way of the Qiang territory is in danger, as the Qiang people hate us; if we send them a little farther north, they will be captured by the Xiongnu. The road through Shu would be the most direct route, and without enemies.38

On hearing Zhang Qian's report, Emperor Wu dispatched four envoys to look for the route. They failed to find the route, but they did return with some knowledge about the indigenous population around Yunnan. These earliest records by Sima Qian leave us with invaluable as well as rather obscure information on the Southwest Silk Road.

21Extending beyond Southwest China, Tibet, Southeast Asia, and South Asia, the SSR included four main branches with many sub-branches. The first was from Sichuan/Yunnan, via Burma to India, called the Road of Chuan-Dian-Mian-Yin (Sichuan-Yunnan-Burma-India) or of Shu-Yandu (Sichuan-India) by the Chinese. Because of its enormous significance, scholars sometimes identify this branch as the SSR. However, other roads also contributed to the formation and function of the SSR. One connected Vietnam with Yunnan; one connected Yunnan with Laos, Thailand, and Cambodia; another was from Yunnan, sometimes via Sichuan, to Tibet and India. Because the main articles traded along this road were tea and horses, it was named Dianzang Chama Gudao (ancient road of tea and horses between Yunnan and Tibet).39

22Due to its historical and spatial complexity, a concise overview of these sections of the SSR is necessary for providing an overall idea of the nature of these various routes.

23The Sichuan-Yunnan-Burma-India Road was a major section of the SSR. It started from Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan and a symbol of the developed Shu culture that was no less significant than the Shang culture. Guanghan, a city less than one hundred kilometers from Chengdu, was the site of the well-known Sanxingdui relics that had cultivated a sophisticated bronze culture, which might have exerted great influence on Southeast Asia.40 From Chengdu through Kunming to Dali, the latter two being major commercial and cultural centers of Yunnan, there were two roads. The northern one passed the following cities: Chengdu–Linqiong (Qionglai)–Lingguan (Lushan)–Zuodu (Hanyuan)–Qiongdu (Xichang)–Qingling (Dayao, entering Yunnan)–Dabonong (Xiangyun)–Yeyu (Dali). Because the Ling Pass (Lingguan) had to be used, the northern route was called the Road of Lingguan (Lingguan Dao). The southern one went through the following cities: Chengdu–Yibin–Zhuti (Zhaotong)–Wei County (Qujing)–Dian (Kunming)–Anning–Chuxiong–Yeyu (Dali). So the two roads joined in Dali connecting the Road of Bonan (Bonan Dao), so called because it crossed the Bonan Mountain. The Road of Bonan passed through Yongchang and Tengyue to Burma and India.

24The second branch of the SSR was from Yunnan to Vietnam.41 The Hong River linked Yunnan and northern Vietnam, which accounted for some common features of bronze culture found in Yunnan and Vietnam. The route actually utilized part of the Yuan River (Hong River). It started from Miling of Jiaozhi, via Jinsang and Fengu to Dali, where it connected to the Bonan Road.42 That is why Jia Dan (730–805) of the Tang Dynasty named it Annan Tong Tianzhu Dao (the route connecting Annam and India).

25The third section connected Yunnan with Laos, Thailand, and Cambodia. Indeed southern Yunnan, Upper Burma, and Laos, cannot be divided either geographically, culturally, or ethnically. Though we lack early Chinese documents, tribute missions of small states in mainland Southeast Asia were by no means rare after the Tang. Since these routes can be seen as extensions of the Chuan-Dian-Burma-India road, I would discuss them together.

26The above three sections of the SSR are what Sun Laichen calls the "Sino-Southeast Asian overland interactions," which constituted half of the Sino-Southeast Asian communications. Obviously Yunnan functioned as a nucleus of these overland interactions. Before we turn to the connection between Yunnan and Tibet, let us first examine Chinese sources of the Tang period that illustrate the dynamics of the three southward routes crisscrossing Yunnan.

27Xuanzang (mid-seventh century) and Yijing (late seventh century), the two famous Chinese Buddhist pilgrims, both mentioned the route between India and Sichuan in some detail. Their records of miles and days were fairly close, which revealed that people of that time were familiar with the route.43 Fan Chuo, a military official who served in Tang China's Annam Protectorate (Annan Duhufu), recorded these roads in his Man Shu (Records of the barbarians, compiled c. 863) too.44 But all their contributions were surpassed by the details provided by Jia Dan.

28Jia Dan was a prime minister (zaixiang) of the Tang court, who in 801 presented the emperor with books that documented Sino-foreign communications. Although his books are currently missing, Xin Tang Shu (New history of the Tang Dynasty), edited in the tenth century, fortunately kept a record of the seven routes he discerned that linked China with the "barbarians" of four directions. The sixth linked Annam with India (Tianzhu). This route started from Tonkin, via Yunnan, through Prome, to Magahda.45 According to Jia Dan's records, there were two ways from Tonkin to Dali, one taking the river, the other overland. After arriving at Dali, the routes joined together, and extended to Burma and India. From Yunnan to India, again there were two routes: the southern one from Dali to Yongchang, through the Pyu Kingdom, Prome, the Arakan Range, Kamarupa, and arriving in India; the western one crossing the Irrawaddy and the Mogaung rivers, the Chindwin River to India, and beyond. This western route was about 3,200 li, compared with 5,600 li of the southern route. The southern route seemed too roundabout, but it was important, because it not only linked Yunnan and Burma but also connected the Maritime Silk Road with the SSR, which explained why merchants bothered to take this longer and winding way.46 Because all the above sources were recorded by the Chinese, and many of them indeed were cited from official and pro-official histories, it was no wonder that scholars could have such a relatively clear map of the SSR within the boundaries imagined by the Chinese. Indeed, one of the shortcomings of present research concerns the section connecting Burma, Assam, and the Indian states.

29Mountainous regions characterize areas from Burma to Assam and westward. These parallel south-north ranges are natural communication barriers. Fortunately, many passes exist, presumably fully utilized by peoples on both sides, however local peoples left us without any early documents. Modern and contemporary descriptions, nonetheless, may help us trace the routes of earlier times.

30When examining how bullion was shipped from Yunnan and Upper Burma into Bengal between 1200 and 1500, John Deyell illustrated the intertwined network of three overland routes from Yongchang, through Upper Burma westward to Bengal.

The first went from Yung Chang to Momien, crossed the Irrawaddy to Mogaung, went north through the Hukong Valley, across passes in the Patkai Range, to the upper Brahmaputra Valley. This was the eastern frontier of Kamarupa. The second route followed the Shweli River, crossing the Irrawaddy at Tagaung, followed the Chindin River north and crossed via the Imole pass to Manipur. This was the eastern approach to Bangala via Tripura. The third route embarked on the Irrawaddy at Tagaung, Ava or Pagan, and then passed from Prome over the Arakan Range to Arakan. A variation of this went directly from Pagan to Arakan via the Aeng pass. This gave access to either a land route northwards to Chatisgaon, or embarkation on the coastal trading boats to Bengal.47

31Nisar Ahmad, when discussing the Assam-Bengal trade of the medieval ages, also detailed the trade routes between the two areas. Three routes lead from Assam to Bengal: one by water and the other two by land. The Brahmaputra River was an excellent waterway for the movement of vessels. Of the two land routes, one was from Tezpur (Darang district of Assam) to Lakhnauti (the capital of Bengal Sultans) through the districts of Kamrupa and Goalpara, in the north of Brahmaputra; the second route was in the south of the Brahmaputra River. When crossing the river, it joined the first path. The second path seems to be favored by merchants who were interested in sea-trade, since it connected with the river ports of Bengal. Moreover, Lakhnauti had the advantage of a line of connection with Tibet via Kamrupa. Likewise, there also was a route from Kashmir to China (Yunnan) via Koh-i-kara-chal (Kumaon Mountains), Patkai Hills, and the upper districts of Burma, which was joined by a passage from Lakhnauti. Furthermore, Nisar points out that some portions of the three routes (Lakhnauti-Tezpur, Lakhnauti-Tibet and Lakhnauti-China) were probably common.48 Though both scholars hypothesize about routes of the early medieval ages, ancient routes should have been similar, due to local topography.

32The last section of the SSR was between Yunnan and Tibet. The Yunnan-Guizhou plateau is indeed an extension of Tibetan Plateau so that northwestern Yunnan naturally connects to Tibet. During the Ming Dynasty, Yunnan exported tea to Tibet, which began the climax of this route. Tea started from Puer, via Dali, Lijiang, Zhongdian, Zayu, Bomi, to Lhasa, and from Lhasa to Nepal and India. However, because Sichuan also neighbored Tibet, the Yunnan tea could pass through Sichuan to Tibet. Likewise, the Sichuan tea could be shipped through Yunnan, too. These routes are exactly what Deyell notices: "A separate apparently well-traveled and renowned route led from the region of the Upper Yangtse-Mekong-Shalween rivers through Tibet. Passes led through Bhutan and Nepal into Kamarupa and Hindustan respectively."49

33Known as the Tea Horse Route, the Yunnan-Tibet connection started much earlier than in the eighth century, when Tibetan people began to drink tea. However, since Yunnan bordered Tibet, Burma, and India, it could take the southward road through Burma, India, and then to Tibet. Fan Chuo also noticed this southern route.50 Roundabout as it was, the route had often been used before the Tang period, because it converged into the Yunnan-Burma-India route. Still, this way was much longer. Communications between India and Yunnan had quite often taken the northwestern branch since the eighth century, which was a result of the close relationship between Yunnan and Tibet. In fact, the Tibetan Tubo Empire once controlled northwestern Yunnan, where many local states accepted Tibetan suzerainty in the seventh and eighth century.

34Above is a very short overview of the Southwest Silk Road. Despite the introduction of maps, it should not be forgotten that the four sections emerged at different times. The sections functioned variously, and their sub-branches changed courses historically. In the following parts of the chapter, I will examine the four sections one by one to reveal the details of the historical changes that took place.

The Genesis of the Yunnan-Burma-India Road

Tracing the Origins of Trade Materials

35Scholars consider the Yunnan-Burma-India Road (dianmianyin dao) the main path of the Southwest Silk Road and the other three sections its branches. Because of its significance, scholars often focus their discussions on this main path, examining it in order to discover the origins of the SSR as a whole.

36When Zhang Qian saw cloth and bamboo canes from Sichuan in Bactria of the late second century BCE, he suspected a route between Southwest China and India. So he reported on this possibility to Emperor Wu,51 who then dispatched his envoys to explore the way to India. All of them failed, with one having been stopped by the Kunming people in Yunnan. Many scholars of China such as Fang Guoyu accepted what Zhang Qian reported. They believed that the road was in use as late as the second century BCE. Could the date have been pushed back earlier? The majority of scholars in China support the argument that the road emerged as early as the fourth century BCE. One piece of evidence they cited was what Ji Xianlin, a most famous scholar of Sino-Indian cultural relationships, discussed the word cinapattas in Arthasastra, a Sanskrit work of around the fourth century BCE. Cinapatta was translated by Ji into "bunches of Chinese silk," implying that Chinese silk was known to Indians at that time.52 However, how did Chinese silk make its way to India? Ji listed all the routes between India and China, including the three Silk Roads and the Nepal-Tibet-China route. It is possible that the silk went through the SSR, but considering the threat posed to silk by its jungles, I doubt this speculation.

37Archaeological findings in Sichuan and Yunnan may shed some light on this issue. Since the 1950s tens of thousands of cowries in Yunnan have been found in tombs dating back to between the Warring State period (475 BCE–221 BCE) and the Western Han Dynasty (206 BCE–9 CE). These cowries were from the Pacific and Indian oceans, especially from the Maldives. They may have been shipped to Burma first and then arrived in Yunnan in the same way, but it is more likely that they went first to Bengal by sea, and then were brought to Yunnan through overland routes, since navigation between the Maldives and Burma was harder than that between Bengal and the Maldives. If so, the route could be traced back to the mid-first millennium BCE. Could the date be earlier still? It is possible.

38Several hundred cowries have been found in the Sanxingdui relics near Chengdu, in tombs that are dated about 1100 BCE. The shells, like what was unearthed in Yunnan, belong to the Cypraeetitris, Monetaria annulus, and Monetaria moneta species and, although they may have come from the southeast coastal areas via the Yangzi River, it is more likely that they arrived via the SSR, considering again the overwhelming challenge of navigating from South China Sea or the Indian Ocean to South or Southeast China. If they did indeed follow the SSR, the spread of bronze drums suggests that the road is dated to the late second millennium BCE.53

39Other archaeological articles discovered in Yunnan may have hastened the emergence of the SSR prior to Zhang Qian's time. Xia Nai in 1974 noticed that a decorated carnelian bead (shihua rouhong shisuizhu) around the third or second century BCE in Shizhaishan (Jinning County, where the capital of the Dian Kingdom was located) was manmade. Such beads were also found in Xinjiang and Tibet. Made in India and Pakistan, they spread westward to Egypt and northward to Iran. Xia pointed out that this decorated carnelian bead either could have been imported or made locally in Yunnan.54 Later, another decorated carnelian bead was found in Lijiashan (Jiangchuan, Yunnan) and is dated around the fourth century BCE. Zhang Zengqi argues that both beads were imported on the grounds that many agates were uncovered with the beads, and if the beads were made locally, why were more, rather than just two, not unearthed?55 In another tomb in Lijiashan, a blue transparent liuli bead was found.56 It is dated in the same period as the carnelian bead. This blue bead, never seen in inland China before, was different from local products in terms of design, color, and transparency. Hence it was suspected to have been imported.57

40Amber beads found in interior China provided further evidence. It is believed that these ambers came from Yunnan, since Yongchang was recorded to produce such beads. It now appears that Yongchang was just a transit station for beads from Burma.58 Two other items found in Shizhaishan, dated around the same time as the carnelian bead, were believed to have been imported from Central and West Asia. One was a gold-and-silver belt hook inlaid with a winged tiger whose eyes were transparent yellow liuli beads (youyihucuojinyindaigou). This kind of belt ornament never appeared in China until the third century, about four hundred years later. The other was a bronze button with gold-plated sculpture (liujin fudiao tongshi kou). Standing on the sculpture were two animals that were suspected to be lions. However, lions are not indigenous to China, and the first lion was reportedly presented by Parthia in the first century. Though they were possibly transported through the Silk Road, Zhang Zengqi insisted that they moved along the SSR.59 Carnelian beads unearthed in central Thailand suggest that Zhang probably is right,60 but we still lack solid evidence.

41Indeed Zhang Qian's account is as questionable as it is invaluable, precisely because he was a sole witness. Scholars question why bamboo canes, which were cheap products, were taken several thousand miles away; South India had its own bamboo and cloth.61 Other scholars responded that shubu was indeed not cotton, but a kind of linen (ma) product, and that qiongzhu too had relatively high value.62. Xia Nai and others also contest the existence of the SSR because the hardship brought by climate and topography, as well as the heterogeneity and enmity among local tribes and states would have made the route a most difficult one to follow63As a result, these scholars either denied the existence of the SSR in Zhang Qian's time or sought alternative passages.64 One possibility was a route from Shu (Sichuan) via the Yelang Kingdom (Guizhou) to the Southern Yue (Guangdong and Guangxi), joined by the Maritime Silk Road.65 Another possibility was from Yunnan via the Hong River or the Panlong River to Jiaozhi (Vietnam), then taking the Maritime Silk Road.66 Local products from Sichuan could have taken the Sichuan-Tibet route.67 We have no reason to deny these alternatives, since the Han court seemed to have known very little about Yunnan before Zhang Qian's report.68 However, it seems that the Maritime Silk Road prior to the second century BCE was no less demanding than the SSR. And of course, the road from Yunnan to Jiaozhi was part of the SSR.

42Most scholars do not deny the existence of the SSR; they only doubt it came into existence before the mid-first millennium BCE. Indeed, many eminent scholars, including Paul Pelliot, Fang Guoyu, and Rao Zongyi, agree with Zhang Qian as well as a few early non-Chinese texts. Arthasastra, which was composed in the reign of Chandragupta Maurya (late fourth century BCE), reads, "My teacher says that, of the land-routes that which leads to the Himalayas is better than that which leads to the South. Not so, says Kautilya, for with the exception of blankets, skins, and horses, other articles of merchandise, such as conch-shells, diamonds, precious stones, pearls and gold are available in plenty in the South."69 If this source is truly of the fourth century BCE, we can postulate that trade along routes leading to the Himalayas was well-established. One of those routes leading to the Himalayas probably went through Upper Burma to Yunnan, on the grounds that blankets, skins, and horses were famous local products in Yunnan. However, Tibet was known for these products, too.

43Some Western sources seem to support the above speculation. The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, written by a Greek of the mid-first century, says, "After the region (Chryse) under the very north, the sea outside ending in a land called This, there is a great inland city called Thinae, from which raw silk and silk yarn and silk cloth are brought on foot through Bactria to Barygaza."70 Wilfred Schoff points out that Chryse was the Malacca Peninsula and This actually meant the Qin Empire whose capital is Thinae (Xianyang).His interpretation may be correct since many famous Malay products such as gold, tortoise-shells, and pearls are mentioned by the Greek record, and the geographical descriptions of the neighborhood are basically accurate.71 It is interesting to notice the south-centric view of the author who mentions that the Qin was located in the north, which means that he might have landed in Burma and might also have known the road led northward to China. If so, the road from coastal mainland Southeastern Asia via Upper Burma and Yunnan leading to inland China might have been utilized before, even long before, the arrival of the Greeks.72

44While some scholars turn to the emergence of shubu and qiongzhu in Bactria to suggest the west-bound migratory pattern of materials, Joseph Needham advances the Bactria alloy theory to make the same argument. In Science and Civilization in China, Needham offers a summary of his theory: "The Greek kingdoms in Bactria during the first half of the second century BCE used a cupro-nickel coinage, so far as is at present known the oldest in the world."73 Cupro-nickel, or paktong (from the Chinese term baitong, literally meaning "white copper"), had been tested by nineteenth-century scientists, and they proposed "that the nickel of the Graeco-Indian coins must have come overland somehow from China; thus initiating what came to be called the 'the Bactrian nickel theory.'"74 W. W. Tarn, in his Greeks in Bactria and India, clearly already believed that Bactrian nickel came from China.75

45Needham insists that "the ratios of the constituents in the Bactrian alloys (copper, lead, iron, nickel, and cobalt) are closely similar to those in classical Chinese paktong," and that "out of nine known Asian nickel deposits only those in China would have been likely to give the ratios found."76 Here Needham refers to Yunnan, and he is "inclined to believe" that paktong was shipped from Yunnan and passed through Xinjiang.77 Obviously, Needham forgot the route through Burma.

46Scholars opposing the Bactrian alloy theory have made comparatively weak arguments. Schuyler van R. Cammann, for example, constructs his argument by pointing out that in the third century BCE, Yongchang "was a wild and barbarous area."78 The backward and "barbarian" image of the Ailao people around Yongchang again is the result of assumed superiority of Chinese culture. After all, bronze metallurgy in Yunnan was much advanced in the middle of the first millennium BCE. Additionally, since there were no other sources of paktong at the time, where else, other than Yunnan, could it have come from?79 Schuyler Van R. Cammann highlights the alloy theory's flaw: If paktong traveled through the SSR, why were nickel alloys not found in other sites in India?80 Presently, no answer exists. Another conspicuous problem is that no paktong items earlier than the Ming period (1368–1644) have even been found in Yunnan.81

47I agree with the argument that the road came into being before the Qin-Han period, namely, before the third century BCE. Nevertheless, it is difficult to ascertain when sporadic exchanges turned into a regular trade unless supplied with further evidence, leaving the chance for future archaeological findings. Assuming the existence of the SSR at that time, we should not exaggerate the scale of trade. I can therefore appreciate Harald Bockman's cautious approach regarding Yunnan trade during the Han times (206 BCE–220 CE), concluding, "There is still too scant evidence for proclaiming it a 'Southern Silk Road,'" for there are "very few archaeological indicators" of the volumes and goods of the trade.82

Text, Tribute, and Trade: Further Evidence for the Yunnan-Burma-India Road

48Efforts of the Western Han and Eastern Han to bring Southwest China into their own territories left us many more textual documents on the trade along the Yunnan-Burma-India Road. In 122 BCE, when one Han envoy dispatched by Emperor Wu reached as far as the Dian Kingdom, Changqiang, the king of Dian, detained them. The Han envoy waited over a year, as the Kunming people blocked their way westward so that none of them were able to reach India.83 But "they did learn, however, that some 1,000 or more li to the west there was a state called Dianyue whose people rode elephants and that merchants from Shu sometimes went there with their goods on unofficial trading missions."84 It was possible that Changqiang and the Kunming people stopped the Han envoys just like the Parthia people blocked Ban Chao, an Eastern Han envoy of the first century who was expected to open direct communications with the Romans.85 Both of the Han attempts to open direct communication failed because local peoples wanted to retain their secret and monopolize one part of the highly profitable long-distance trade.

49The above documents present us with further information of the SSR, for instance, about the Dianyue state, about which scholars disagreed. Some argued that it was located in present-day Tengyue in southern Yunnan; some stated that it was Piaoyue (panyue or hanyue), an ancient state located in Burma; other insisted that it was Kamarupa in Assam.86 No matter where it was, the Shu merchants had been there and it seemed that they wanted to keep the trade a secret, which suggested that long-distance trade had already been going on.

50By the end of the first century, the Han Empire controlled most of what today is Yunnan. Many tributes to that time have been recorded: In 94 CE, Moyan, the king of Dunrenyi, located outside Yongchang Prefecture, sent a tributary envoy with rhinoceros and elephants; in 97 CE, Yongyoudiao, the king of Sham, and other barbarians, out of the frontiers, presented treasures.87 Emperor He presented Yongyoudiao with a gold seal (jinyin) and purple ribbon (zishou) and gifted other "barbarian" chiefs with silks and coins; both of these tributary missions were accompanied by interpreters. In 107 CE, the Jiaoyaozhong, with over 3,000 people out of the frontiers, subjected themselves to the Han Empire by presenting elephant tusks and oxen. In 120 CE, Yongyoudiao sent a tributary mission again that included musicians and acrobats. The latter was said to have the magical power that enabled them to spit fire, decompose their bodies, and switch heads between horse and oxen. They called themselves Haixiren (people west of the sea).88 Significantly, haixi usually refers to Rome.

51Compared to the few missions from the North Silk Road, the frequency of tribute missions (around the second century) from the southern regions is noteworthy. The astonishing contrast lies in the decades of chaos in Central Asia after the collapse of the Western Han; at the same time the contrast reveals the increasing significance of the SSR. Probably suffering from the blockades in the north, peoples in the west had to turn to alternatives, and the SSR seemed to be the shortcut. Interestingly, the author of Periplus of the Erythraean Sea might have noticed or might have taken the same route in the mid-first century, just a little earlier than the time of these tributes. If we doubt whether the SSR was open in the time of Zhang Qian, the above Chinese and Western sources together have shown that the route was prosperous at least around the mid-first century. The History of the Eastern Han Dynasty clearly states that Haixi was Daqin (haixi ji daqin ye), and that the Sham connected Daqin southwestward (shanguo xi'nan tong daqin).89 Unfortunately, India was rarely mentioned. But the Yandu people were recorded in Hua Yang Guo Zhi.90 That is why Yu Yingshi, after examining both textual and archaeological evidence, was more inclined to accept the existence of the India-Burma-Yunnan trade route in the Han time.91 He concludes that "it seems beyond doubt that the Southwestern Barbarians must have developed increasingly close economic relations with some of the natives of Burma and India and, through them, Han China also gradually but steadily came into economic intercourse with both Burma and India along this famous trade route."92

Trade and the Emergence of Cities

52Benefiting from frequent trade missions, Yongchang, the frontier city of the first century, became an important international trade center. Indeed, it was said that "Yongchang produces exotic goods" (Yonchang chu yiwu).93 Significantly, the word chu means not only "produce" but also "export," implying that the goods considered "exotic" were probably not locally produced. Both HYGZ and HHS present the list of "exotic" articles, including copper, tin, lead, gold, silver, jade, precious stones, liuli, cowries, pearls, ribbons, elephants, water buffalos, cattle, ivory, peacock, cottons, and so on.94 Diverse merchandise was brought by diverse merchants. HYGZ mentions that there "live peoples of Minpu, Jiuliao, Biaoyue, Luopu, and Yandu."95 Merchants from the west, for example, the Haixiren (people west of the sea), were also recorded in HHS.

53The prosperity and dynamics of Yongchang can be confirmed by its growing population. When the king of Ailao submitted his kingdom to the Eastern Han in 69 CE, it is recorded that the Ailao Kingdom had a population of over half a million. The Han court then set up a Yongchang Prefecture, administrating the Ailao area and six counties from the Yizhou Prefecture. One source reads, "Yonchang Prefecture [has] eight cities, 231,897 households, and 1,897,344 people."96 A frontier area, as Yongchang Prefecture was, its population ranked almost the largest among all temporary prefectures, more than that of Shu Prefecture (1,350,476), the traditional center of Southwest China.97 No other reasons than international trade accounted for the population. The above statistics may have been exaggerated; nevertheless, other sources still affirm that Yongchang was one of the most populous areas in Southwest China, and it continues to be so.98 These documents have severely challenged Bockman, who questioned the existence of trade during the Han period, and I agree with him that it is hard to justify a "Southern Silk Road," because silk was not a major trade item.

54The collapse of the Eastern Han in the early third century left a chaotic world in China for more than 300 years until the unification of the Sui Dynasty in 581. There were not too many sources of the SSR after the fourth century, with the Maritime Silk Road flourishing. One source stated that a Buddhist pilgrim around the fourth century took this route to India.99 Yijing, a Tang monk who arrived in eastern India, saw a monastery that was built by Srigupta for over twenty Chinese pilgrims from Sichuan who had traveled through Yunnan and Burma.100 Two hundred and twenty-seven monks were calculated to have traveled before the end of sixth century, including Chinese pilgrims to India and Indians to China.101 Among them, many might have taken the Sichuan-Yunnan-Burma-India Road.

55The rise of local powers in mainland Southeast Asia from the seventh century onward reflects the ongoing cross-regional trade. Six or eight kingdoms in the Dali area, including Nanzhao, emerged, and Nanzhao became the first unified kingdom around Yunnan. A number of towns flourished in the Nanzhao and Dali periods. Likewise, many regimes thrived in mainland Southeast Asia in the early medieval period (by which I mean the eighth to mid-thirteenth centuries).102 Fang Guoyu, by examining diverse Chinese sources, provides a list of kingdoms, city-states, towns, and tribes or tribal alliances that were located in mainland Southeast Asia and had contacts with Nanzhao. Besides Nanzhao and later Dali in Yunnan, this list includes the Pyu (Biao), Pagan (Pugan), Miruo, Michen, Kunlun, Bosi, Luzhenla, Shuizhenla, Canbanguo, Nüwangguo, Daqinpoluomen, Xiaoqinpoluomen, Kamarupa, and so on.103 Historian G. E. Harvey points out that "the Chinese described Burma in the ninth century as containing eighteen states and nine walled towns all of which were dependent on the Pyu. Their chief town was Prome but traditions of them survive as far north as the Kabaw valley."104 Harvey adds that

after the fall of Prome[,] its people migrated to Pagan, merged with the local tribes, and thereafter were known as the Burmese. A cluster of nineteen villages, Pagan developed into a town that became the capital of all Burma from the eleventh to the thirteenth century. The situation is good, near the confluence of the Chindwin and Irrawaddy rivers, and it was probably here that a trade route from the Shan states joined one from Yunnan on their way to Assam.105

Because of the frequent trade and tributary missions, the Chinese noticed increasing internal interactions within mainland Southeast Asia. Jia Dan, for instance, recorded a route connecting Huanzhou (central Vietnam) with Wendanguo or Luzhenla (around Laos) and Shuizhenla (around Cambodia).106

56The profit of trade facilitated the strength of Nanzhao, and the drive to control trade may have been the impetus for Nanzhao's military campaigns against other southern states. Nanzhao, according to Chinese texts, had military conflicts with the Pyu, Michenguo, Miruoguo, Shuizhenla, Luzhenla, Nüwangguo, Kunlun, and helped the Pyu defeat an attack from the Shiziguo.107 Nanzhao, probably having imposed its own tributary system on the Pyu and other Southeast Asian states, took a Pyu mission to Chang'an to pay tribute to the Tang court.108 Pyu music and instruments were presented and welcomed in the Tang court. These missions may have been the key source for updated knowledge of Southeast Asia for the Chinese. It was certainly not a coincidence that Jia Dan's books on Sino-foreign communications were presented only seven years after the establishment of the Tang-Nanzhao alliance.

57The burgeoning towns and states might have taken shape earlier; however, the fact that they were recorded by the Chinese at this time leads to two conclusions. First, the emergence of a series of towns and states were not only nurtured by the Maritime Silk Road but also by overland trade and communications. To put it simply, commerce through the interplay between the SSR and the Maritime Silk Road was the logical reason for urbanization. Second, communications around Yunnan (the Nanzhao and Dali kingdoms) were so frequent that the Chinese, through direct or indirect contacts, greatly improved their knowledge of mainland Southeast Asia, as revealed in Fan Chuo's Man Shu.109

58When the Dali Kingdom was established in Yunnan, trade continued to flourish, but unfortunately, not so many records about these trade routes existed. The shortage of Chinese sources resulted from the intentional decision of the Song Dynasty (961–1279) to reduce and control communications with Dali when Song China was struggling to keep the northern neighbors from invading. Although the Song blocked trade between Sichuan and Yunnan, commercial links between Yunnan and Guangxi developed because the Song needed horses from Dali. Moreover, there was no reason to doubt the trade between Dali and Southeast Asia, considering the prosperity of the Maritime Silk Road. Some texts reflected that Dali kept close relations with states in mainland Southeast Asia. For example, in 1136, Dali and Pagan paid tributes in the Song court.110

59As discussed above, Yongchang, the extreme southern frontier city, became a major international trade center of China around the second century. The fame of Yongchang lasted many centuries, and the trade probably grew even more prosperous in the Nanzhao and Dali periods. Merchants and merchandise in Yongchang indeed were not only from southern coastal areas but also from Annam. This was noticed by Zhang Jianzhi, a Tang minister, as he insightfully stated that Yongchang communicated with Daqin to the west, and to the south, with Jiaozhi, a region that is in modern-day North Vietnam.111

The Yunnan-Vietnam Path

60The communication between Yunnan and Vietnam can be traced back a long time. The similarities between bronzes and other cultural artifacts and suggest strong historical ties between Yunnan and Vietnam. Chinese texts record that a prince of the Shu Kingdom conquered northern Vietnam in the third century BCE, when the Qin expanded into the Shu. The prince's trip from Shu to Vietnam might have passed Yunnan. Though the story was recorded quite late, some Vietnamese scholars believed it to be reliable.112 But when did the communications between Yunnan and Vietnam start?

61Paul Pelliot, in the early twentieth century, while recognizing the Chinese administration of northern Vietnam around the first century, stated that no document existed to trace communications between Yunnan and Tonkin at that time.113 Nonetheless, scholars of China have revealed the relevant passage in Shui Jing Zhu, a geographic work of the sixth century that Pelliot overlooked.114 When discussing the Yeyushui (Hong River), Shui Jing Zhu cites Ma Yuan's story. Ma Yuan was a general of the Eastern Han who put down a rebellion in Jiaozhi in 43 CE. Upon hearing of the rebellion in Yizhou (Yunnan), Ma Yuan suggested that his army move to Yunnan, giving a detailed description of his route.115 Thus, the route between Yunnan and Vietnam must also have been quite broad if Ma Yuan believed that his army could advance. Another Chinese source traced this relationship back a decade earlier. In the late Western Han, around the first century, when Wen Qi was assigned as governor of Yizhou Prefecture, Gongsun Shu occupied the Shu area and claimed independence. Gongsun asked for Wen Qi's submission but was refused. When Wen Qi heard about the founding of Eastern Han, he sent his envoy to Luoyang by way of Jiaozhi.116

62More sources of the third century have documented this Yunnan-Annam connection, thanks to the tight competition over Jiaozhi and Nanzhong between the Shu regime, based in Sichuan, and the Wu regime, based in Jiangnan (south of the Yangzi River). Liu Ba, an envoy of the Wei Kingdom from North China, was dispatched to Changsha, Lingling, and Guiyang, all south of the Yangzi River. However, the above three prefectures were taken by the Shu, and Liu could not return back. Liu Ba then went southward to Jiaozhi, from there to Yunnan, from Yunnan to Sichuan, and finally returned to North China.117 When the Shu surrendered to the Wei, the Wei then sent an army to take over Jiaozhi, which had been occupied by the Wu. Seven years later the Wu army of 300,000 soldiers took it back.118 Such frequent and heated military competition revealed the access to and significance of this connection.

63The military events signified the close communication between Yunnan and Vietnam, but the communication was no less commercial. Because of its location, Jiaozhi (now as Jiaozhou) became the major port city of the Maritime Silk Road before the Tang Dynasty, when navigation technology developed so much that ships preferred to arrive in Guangzhou.119 Docking in Jiaozhou, some merchants took the route to Yunnan. Commercial items included rhinoceros, elephants, pearls, horses, silver, copper, silks, cloths, jade, precious stones, spices, tortoise shell, and so on. Hence international trade partially explains why the Shu and the Wu both tried to control Jiaozhi.120 The prosperity of the Nanhai trade certainly yielded a positive effect on the Yunnan-Annam connection, as exotic goods in Yongchang came not only from the west but also from Jiaozhi.121

64The seventh century witnessed the rise of Nanzhao in Yunnan, but the trade between Yunnan and Vietnam, namely, Tang China's Annam Protectorate, continued. Nanzhao exchanged its horses for Vietnamese salt. A couple of skirmishes between Nanzhao and Annam resulted from the unfair trade that the governor of Annam forced on the Nanzhao merchants. The hostility, of course, had negative effects on communication, but private trade never seemed to have stopped. Indeed, because of strict Tang isolation of the Sichuan frontier passes for a period of time, and because of Tubo's control of its southeastern frontiers, the Yunnan-Vietnam communication was rather regular, which can be accounted for by Yi-mou-xun's envoy to Chang'an. Unable to tolerate Tubo's extraction, Yi-mou-xun, the king of Nanzhao, sent three envoys to Chang'an to seek an alliance with Tang China. One envoy took the way through Annam, which implied that the Yunnan-Annam connection was thought to be a regular line of communication.122

65Nonetheless, Yunnan-Annam communication declined in the late Tang after wars around Annam destroyed the trade, and the independence of Annam probably had negative repercussions for trade. In addition, Guangzhou gradually took the place of Jiaozhou in the Nanhai trade. However, trade through Guangxi prospered during the Dali-Song period, as this frontier area neighbored both the Dali Kingdom and Annam that sought to trade with the Song. Moreover, Qinzhou and Lianzhou, the two port cities of Guangxi, also attracted the sea trade.

66The Song state established over a dozen markets in Sichuan and Guangxi to trade Yunnan horses from Dali.123 While horses were the major goods, there was no lack of other articles. Silk, cloths, salt, tea, and even Confucian books and Buddhist sutras from China were exchanged for oxen, elephants, sheep, chicks, gold, silver, weapons, armor, and various herbs from Yunnan. Furthermore, Dali gained access to the sea products through these markets. Markets were set up by the Song state in Qinzhou, a major port city, and in Yongpingzhai, designed for merchants with diverse sea goods from Annam. Hence, Dali, Song, and Annam participated in a trade networks around Guangxi, namely, the Yongzhou (Nanning, Guangxi) Road.

67The Yongzhou Road was so named because Yongzhou had a major horse market. Three branches from Yunnan leading to Yongzhou through Guizhou (northern, southern, and middle), were all detailed in Zhou Qufei's Lingwai Daida of the thirteenth century.124 The northern route started from Dali through Shanshan (Kunming), ran through Luodian State (Anshun, Guizhou), and reached the Hengshanzhai Market. The middle route started from Dali through Shanshan (Kunming), went to Shicheng (Qujing), Luoping, Qi (Xingyi, Guizhou), crossing the Nanpan River, to Sicheng (Lingyun, Guangxi), and then to the Hengshanzhai Market. The southern route started from Dali, carried on through Kaiyuan, Guangnan, Aian (Boai, Guangxi), Napo, and Ande, and then came to the Hengshanzhai Market.125

68But the route, in fact, did not end either in Dali or in Yongzhou. From Dali it led to Burma and India, or northeastward to Tibet. From Yongzhou, the route went southward, either to Annam or Qinzhou, a port city in Guangxi. From Qinzhou merchants could sail to Guangzhou or other ports along the southeastern coast, or to Southeast Asia. If they took the northeastward overland routes from Yongzhou, merchants were heading for Jiangnan, the center of the Southern Song, and the richest area in the world at the time.126 The road between Yunnan and Yongzhou in the Dali/Song time became extremely important; as Zhou Qufei concluded, "The roads between China and southern barbarians, must take the way of Hengshanzhai in Yongzhou."127

The Yunnan-Tibet Path

69As stated above, the Yunnan-Tibet connection included two branches, the southern and the northwestern. The former could be seen as an extension of the Yunnan-Burma-India communication link. Fan Chuo recorded that this route first led south, crossed the Gaoligong Mountains, entered Upper Burma, and turned northwestward to Zayu, Tibet.128 Zayu, a frontier town of cross-regional network, could either reach Burma or India or Yunnan, but the direct one between Yunnan and Tibet certainly was the northwestern route that was called the Tea Horse Route.

70The Tea Horse Route was detailed in the Nanzhao sources. Nanzhao dehuabei, an inscription of stone tablet installed by the Nanzhao king that reviewed the triangle relationship among Nanzhao, Tang, and Tibet, recorded that a tributary mission was sent to Tibet after Nanzhao's victory over the Tang army. It is said that the sixty-person mission presented Tibet with many treasures. As a reward, a Tibetan minister was dispatched to Nanzhao with gold hats, gold horde, gold belts, silk, shells, blanket, horses, sables, silver items, and other local articles.129 In 829, Nanzhao plundered Chengdu and presented Tibet with a gift of 2,000 Shu people as well as other treasures.130 Fan Chuo recorded that big sheep were brought from Tibet.131

71The fame of this road was gained through the tea trade, although many local and exotic goods were circulated on the route. Tea, in the Tibetan language, is pronounced as "ja," the same as that in Japanese, both from ancient Chinese pronunciation. Until the coming of the eighth century, the Tibetan people did not drink tea, even though the king and nobles had tea from China, but not from Yunnan.132 Tea was recorded in Yunnan by Fan Chuo, as the Nanzhao people drank tea boiled with pepper and ginger.133 But there are no clues as to whether tea was exported from Yunnan to Tibet at that time. Neither can we know whether it took place in the Song time when the tea-horse trade in Sichuan was prosperous and later monopolized by the state.

72The Ming-Qing period witnessed the heyday of the tea trade. At that time the Mu clan had risen and dominated the border area between Tibet and Yunnan. Later labeled the Naxi nationality, the Mus, like their predecessors, indeed had close relations with the Tibetan people. Centered in Lijiang, the Mu family was acknowledged by the Mongols and the Ming and the Qing courts. In 1661, the tea-horse trade market was set up in Beishengzhou (Yongsheng), officially recognizing the existing trade. Thanks to the tea-horse trade, many towns prospered; one of these was Lijiang, which had for a long time been the bridge between Yunnan and Tibet.

73It is worth noting that the Tea Horse Route certainly included routes from Sichuan to Tibet. Since Sichuan, Yunnan, and Tibet bordered each other, tea from Sichuan sometimes was shipped first to Yunnan, and then transferred to Tibet; or tea from Yunnan was shipped via Sichuan to Tibet. At first sight, these transfers were unnecessary, but economic supplement and interdependence in the discussed areas made those transactions dynamic and meaningful. One should bear in mind that present administrative boundaries meant nothing to the local peoples at the time. While Tibet consumed the bulk of the tea, a certain amount was sold in Nepal, India, and China proper, too. In fact, the first-class tea produced in Yunnan was for Chinese markets. The Puer tea won a high reputation in Beijing, and was on the list of tributary items presented to the imperial court. Yunnan tea, as a major export, was also shipped into Southeast Asia.134

The SSR in the Yuan-Ming-Qing Period and After

74The discussion above ends before the Yuan Dynasty (except for the Yunnan-Tibet connection) because, following the Mongol conquest, communications among China and its neighbors generated many documents, fully attesting to the existence of the road network at least from this period on. Nonetheless, a look at the communications after the Yuan period will show the historical continuity and development of transactions along the route.

75In 1253, the Mongol cavalry conquered the Dali Kingdom, and in 1276, Yunnan Province was established. However, the Mongols did not stop in Yunnan. They expanded southward into other Southeast Asian states. In order to serve the military conquest and subsequent political control, the Mongols imposed the jam postal (zhanchi) system along the main roads.135 Seventy-eight zhanchi were established in Yunnan, including seventy-four horse stations (mazhan) and four water stations (shuizhan). The former owned 2,345 horses, and thirty oxen, while the latter had twenty-four ships.136 Hence a postal network covered the whole of Yunnan and extended beyond. Indeed seven major postal lines basically characterized the zhanchi system around Yunnan: from Zhongqing (Kunming) via Jianchang (Xichang) to west Sichuan; from Zhongqing via Wumeng (Zhaotong) to Sichuan; from Zhongqing via Guizhou, northward to Dadu (Beijing); from Zhongqing via Guangnan to Yongzhou (Nanning, Guangxi); from Zhongqing via Tonghai to Annam; from Zhongqing via Dali, Yongchang to Burma; and from Zhongqing via Dali to Lijiang.137 In reality these seven lines were routes along the SSR itself.138

76The Ming Empire generally followed the Yuan postal system in Yunnan, except for the postal stations along the road between Yunnan and Annam.139 Every 60 to 80 li, a postal station (yizhan) was set up with one or two dozen horses, managed by a staff of eleven or more. All the expenses for the postal stations were provided by local governments. There were around eighty yizhan in Yunnan through the Ming period, sometimes up to ninety.140 Besides postal stations, bao, or military stations were built, sometimes replacing postal stations.141 During the reign of Wanli (1573–1620), fifty-three bao were stationed in Yunnan, among which thirty-six were along the postal roads and took care of postal services.142 In addition, the Ming court stipulated that xunjiansi, military inspection offices, be set up in the strategic passes for security considerations. Hence many xunjiansi were found, along with postal stations (yizhan) and bao, in the same location.143

77The Qing Dynasty inherited and extended postal stations into native chieftain areas, which the Ming had not yet reached. There were nineteen postal stations (yizhan), twenty bao, and fifty-four military stations (junzhan).144 Between these major stations, pu as small stations were set up every 10, 15, 20, 30, or 40 li, depending on local situations. On the frontier areas where there were no postal stations, pu instead were stationed. Altogether there were over four hundred pu.145

78Examining the Yuan-Ming-Qing period, we can detect the common historical inheritance and development of postal stations and other public communication facilities, even though the territories of the three empires differed. The obvious trend is that over time the postal infrastructure became more comprehensive and systematic, reaching into mountainous areas where ethnic peoples dominated. As a result, a large part of the SSR was incorporated into the official transportation system.

79Official management of roads and postal stations was primarily for military and political goals, but commerce and other cultural communications were by no means less important. First of all, military campaigns and political administration must have accompanied massive material shipping. Furthermore, when the power struggle was over, official interactions between China and Southeast Asia made full use of these roads and services. Chinese documents in this period were filled with records of tributary missions, which is why some roads were named tributary roads (gongdao). As is well known, tributary missions functioned as forms of material exchanges as well as political and cultural interactions. Finally, public management of transportation institutions did not exclude private merchants; rather it benefited private commerce, and as Yu Yingshi points out, "the profit-seeking merchants never failed to use public facilities to serve their private ends."146 The improvement of roads resulted from official involvement, to greater or lesser degrees, and stimulated the transition from commerce of precious items into the commerce of bulk goods, which indeed occurred in the Ming-Qing period.

80A significant contribution of the Southwest Silk Road during the Ming period was the spread of the new crops to China. Ho Ping-Ti, the prominent scholar of Chinese history, has argued that this road during the Ming period (and perhaps throughout Chinese history) was no less important than the Northern Silk Road, as corn and sweet potatoes arrived in China in the end of the sixteenth century firstly through this road.147

81The end of the nineteenth century witnessed the European occupation of mainland Southeast Asia. The expanding European world system had already greatly transformed trade there.148 It was during this period that both the British and French invented the Yunnan myth, which saw Yunnan as the key to their competition in Asia and thus in the world.149 After colonizing Burma and Vietnam, they began to penetrate into Yunnan,150 with plans to build railways or highways that connected Annam or Burma with Yunnan. The Red River was also more fully explored to construct links among Yunnan, Annam, Hong Kong, Canton, and even Tibet.151 Major Davies, after his adventure, proposed a railway connecting India and the Yangzi, a strategic decision for the British Empire in Asia.152 His idea, though never realized, symbolized the feverish ambitions of many colonists. Eventually the French advanced in the colonial rivalry. In 1910, the Dianyue (Yunnan-Annam) Railway was completed. This railway extended 800 kilometers, connecting Kunming with Hanoi, resuming the heyday of the Yunnan-Jiaozhi trade. A large amount of minerals, especially tin, was exported from Yunnan into French Indochina, which served as the foundation of Yunnan economy during the early twentieth century.

82The British, though having failed to build a railway between Yunnan and Burma, succeeded in installing modern transportation in Burma, which considerably stimulated the trade.153 Steamships in the Irrawaddy were busy transporting cotton for Yunnan. For example, when the Yunnan-Tibet connection was blocked due to the turmoil of the 1911 revolution, Yunnan tea was first shipped to Burma and then to Tibet.

83World War II brought unprecedented international attention to the SSR. The nationalist government retreated to Southwest China in 1938. When the Japanese blocked all coastal communications, the SSR contributed greatly to international connections. Before the Japanese occupation of Vietnam in 1940, the Dianyue Railway was China's only access to the sea while the Yunnan-Burma railway and highway were under discussion. The construction of the Yunnan-Burma Railway began in 1938, but was never finished, for many reasons. Nonetheless, the Yunnan-Burma Highway (Dianmian Gonglu) was the major artery for China, especially after the Dianyue Railway was blocked. It was put into use in September 1938, but this ended in May 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burma. Consequently, the Sino-Indian Highway was on the agenda. Its construction moved forward when the war in Burma favored the Allies. January 1945 saw its completion.

84Over 3,000 kilometers long, it started from Ledo in India, continued across Upper Burma, and ended in Kunming. But the most well-known form of transportation may be the Hump Airline that started from Assam, went through valleys of the Himalayas and the Hengduan Mountains, and landed in Yunnan. The airline took over the responsibility of the Yunnan-Burma Highway when the latter was blocked.

85While modern transportation facilities played a significant role, traditional caravans were fully utilized and developed to an unprecedented scale. In 1942, the most difficult part of the war, for China, began. Though the Hump Airline brought a lot of materials, it was unable to meet demands. With no access to Burma after 1942, the Yunnan-Tibet-India connection was the only international passage in Southwest China. Private merchants felt quite patriotic when taking this opportunity to expand their business. Thousands of horses were utilized. International politics had reinstituted the golden age of traditional transportation.

86One episode may suggest the special role Yunnan played in World War II. Yunnan would have provided a wonderland and a promising prospect for hundreds of Jewish refugees in Shanghai. In 1939, a proposal was raised to move 100,000 desperate Jewish people to the remote frontier province, but considered utopian, it was not put into effect.154

87After fifty or so years of isolation, Yunnan and the rest of China are again seeking international access. Taking advantage of its strategic location and its historical closeness with the southern regions, Yunnan is developing a highway connecting China, Southeast Asia, and beyond, attracting internal and international attention once again. This highway, indeed, will start from Xi'an, the symbolic city of the Overland Silk Road, run through Chengdu, Kunming, and Dali, and will reach the Indian Ocean by Southeast Asia.155 Simultaneously, the construction of pipeline for oil from the Middle East through Burma is also being discussed. While the governments attempt to resume their ancient communications, nongovernmental organizations such as international human traffic groups have begun to utilize this road. Some illegal Fujianese immigrants left their southeast coastal homes, went to Yunnan, crossed the border, entered Burma or Thailand, and transferred to some place in Latin America before their arrival in the United States. Traffic of women for prostitution in Thailand follows these routes as well.

The Horse Trade: A Case Study of the SSR

88We have established a general map of the geographic location and historical development of the Southwest Silk Road, especially before the medieval period. Diverse materials circulated on the trade routes, including shell, jade, precious stones, elephants, elephant tusks, horses, lumber, cloth, herbs, spices, salt, tea, gold, silver, copper, tin, lead, cotton, and opium, just to list some of the most familiar products. While discussion of all of the items are beyond the scope of the chapter, the following section will examine the horse trade as a means to examine the dynamics of the SSR. By looking at existing Chinese and non-Chinese scholarship, I seek to illustrate how trade along the SSR indeed shaped local societies.

89The horse was a famous local animal in Yunnan, and according to Sima Qian, a source of wealth, along with slaves and oxen, for people west of the Dian. Horses entered Yunnan with prehistoric migration from Central Asian grasslands.156 After centuries of adaptation, horses in Yunnan could be divided into two types: one found in northwest Yunnan where the climate is cool, the other in southern Yunnan where the climate is subtropical.157 Archaeological evidence reveals that horse husbandry became popular as early as the sixth century BCE. Horses were also used in wars and for transportation.158

90Horses in Yunnan had been well known to the Chinese since the Han Dynasty. During the early Western Han horses were reportedly exported to Sichuan.159 Legends recorded in HYGZ and HHS talk about shenma (divine horses) in Dian Lake, which may imply that horses were valued by the indigenous people as early as the third century.160 Chinese sources also suggest the prosperity of husbandry, as at one time 100,000 head of oxen, horses, and sheep were presented to the Han Dynasty.161 Since the third century, records of horses in Yunnan have been available in Chinese documents. Riding Yunnan/Sichuan horses became fashionable for nobles in the Central Plain, while horses served as instruments of war for local regimes.162

91Sources of the Tang/Nanzhao period documented the roles of horses in local society. For example, Nanzhao presented horses as tributary items to the Tang court.163 Both Man Shu and Xin Tang Shu list the Yuedan horse as the best.164 Yuedan was in the former Ailao area, that is, today's Tengchong. Zhou Qufei in his Lingwai Daida provided more details about the Yunnan horse in the Dali/Song period (mid-tenth to mid-thirteenth century). He concluded that the further northwest, the better the horses. Southern horses, according to his evaluation, were not as durable as northeastern ones. However, he admitted that the best southern horses surpassed northern horses, and were worth several dozen taels of gold.165 In fact, the Song court highly valued Yunnan horses, perceiving them to be as good as those from the north.166

92Chinese people had long desired horses from Central Asia, since most areas of the Chinese realm did not produce horses, which were animals of high commercial, but more importantly, military value.167 South China did not produce horses, which might partially account for the fact that southern-based kingdoms seldom managed to resist northern invasions. Yunnan, south of the Yangzi River, was an important exception, thanks to its unique geography. No wonder southern kingdoms were eager to get access to Yunnan horses. There are the two classic cases, one of the Three Kingdoms period (220–265) and the other of the Dali/Song period.

93Horses in Yunnan gained strategic importance during the third century, a time that witnessed the rise of three kingdoms in China, namely, the Wei in North China, the Wu in Jiangnan, and the Shu in Sichuan. Among them, the Wei was relatively powerful, so there was an alliance between the two southern kingdoms. Nevertheless, conflicts between Shu and Wu occasionally took place. One place of contention was Jiaozhou (northern Vietnam). The control of Jiaozhou was crucial to the Wu Kingdom, because it would not only bring back the incredible profit of the Nanhai trade but also allow access to the horses from Nanzhong (Yunnan) through the Yunnan-Vietnam Road. Furthermore, Jiaozhou was the springboard to Yunnan. The Shu also wanted to take over Jiaozhou, but the situation did not favor it. Yong Kai, the local chieftain who controlled Nanzhong, communicated with Shi Xie, who headed Jiaozhi and sided with the Wu. Therefore, the immediate task of the Shu was not to take over Jiaozhi but Nanzhong, as it did later.

94The Wu's extreme demand for horses is illustrated by the following case. Sun Quan, the King of Wu, dispatched envoys by sea to Liaodong (northeast China), where Gongsun Yuan was in charge. Gongsun however, betrayed his promise, killed the envoys, and presented their heads to the Wei.168 Although the Wu received some horses from the Shu and the Wei through official interactions,169 horses were acquired in large numbers from Nanzhong through Jiaozhi; this was because the Shi family of Jiaozhi paid tribute to the Wu. It is recorded that several hundred horses each year were presented to the Wu.170 We can assume that when the Wu finally overpowered the Shi family in Jiaozhi in 226 and truly ruled Jiaozhi, more horses were moved from Yunnan to Jiangnan.

95The horse trade between Yunnan and Vietnam lasted at least until the Tang era,171 although sources remained silent about horses in other branches of the SSR at the time, however. The Dali/Song period experienced an unprecedented amount of horse trading. Trade being a key component of its economy, the Dali Kingdom desired trade with the Song, and so often appealed to the Song court for tributary relations. The Song court, having seen the troubles between Nanzhao and Tang, no longer intended to impose its suzerainty on Dali, especially when it faced enormous pressure from the north.

96The Northern Song (961–1127) confronted powerful kingdoms on the northern frontiers. The Liao Kingdom (916–1125), the Xixia Kingdom (1032–1227), and the Jin Kingdom (1115–1234), placed great pressure on the Northern Song. Finally, the Northern Song became unable to defend the Yellow River region, and retreated to the Yangzi River, which then marks the beginning of the Southern Song (1127–1279). All the Liao, Xixia, Jin, and later the Mongols enjoyed the advantage of cavalry. So as to fight effectively, the Song demanded good horses.172 Though the Song did make efforts to breed warhorses, it failed to meet the demands of war.173 The only alternative was to trade with nomadic "barbarians." Indeed, northwest horses were the Northern Song's main source of horses. The Song court in the Xining reign (1068–1077) made it a state policy to trade silk and tea for horses.174 When the Song lost the Yellow River region, northwestern horses no longer arrived, which forced the Song to trade with Dali for horses.

97Horses in Yunnan were smaller and shorter than their northern counterparts. The Yunnan horse might not have been good at fighting on northern frontiers, but it should have had some advantages in the Huai River region and in the Yangzi River region, where the climate probably favored the Yunnan horse, a subtropical creature. In addition, some horses in Yunnan were products of the northwestern plateau. That is why Marco Polo concluded, "The best horses here are bred in this province."175 Finally, no matter whether the Yunnan horses were good or not, the Song did not have many choices, especially when horse trade with "the northwestern barbarians" was blocked in the late eleventh century.

98Consequently, the Song officially opened over a dozen markets in Sichuan and Guangxi.176 Sichuan was a major horse-trade center during the Northern Song Dynasty. Official markets were set up in Lizhou (Hanyuan), Yazhou (Yaan), Jiazhou (Leshan), Rongzhou (Yibin), Luzhou, and Changningjun (Gongxian). Merchants from Dali drove their horses and other local products to move through the SSR northward to Sichuan. While encouraging the so-called Southwestern Barbarians to drive their horses to Sichuan, Chinese people were recruited to enter Yunnan as well. Yang Zuo, a jinshi degree holder (Confucian scholars who passed the court examination) in Emei (Sichuan), took all his family assets, led several dozens people with silks and substances that could support them for ten days, found ways through mountains, and finally met local chieftains, announcing the Song's desire to purchase horses.177

99However, the Song's loss of the Yellow River region made Sichuan a frontier area facing both the northern threat and potential southern invasion from Dali, so that the Song tightened the rein of the horse trade and closed some markets in Sichuan. The center of the horse trade shifted to Guangxi. The horse trade in Guangxi began in the Northern Song period and had its apex in the Southern Song period. Like in Sichuan, several markets were established, administrated by the office of the horse trade (Maima Tijusi). Among many horse markets, Hengshanzhai (Tiandong County, Guangxi) was the most famous and lasted the longest, from the Yuanfeng reign (1078–1086) until the Mongol occupation of Yunnan. The Song state set the quota of horses in Guangxi at 1,500 heads each year; however, some years saw the purchase of 3,000 to 4,000 heads.178 The horse trade became a major issue both for central and local governments in the Southern Song period. Proposals were presented to emperors by scholar-officials; debates and discussions were carried out in the court; and detailed regulations were issued. In addition, specific offices and officials were assigned for the horse trade exclusively, where local officials were ordered to help and took part of the responsibility.

Map 2.1 The Southwest Silk Road in the Qin-Han Period

Map 2.2 The Southwest Silk Road in the Nanzhao-Dali Period

100Unlike the previous trade, the horse trade between the Dali and the Song can be utilized to reflect the scale of trade. Fang Guoyu estimated that the average scale of horse trade in Guangxi was about 70,000 taels of silver, based on the 1,500 heads a year and an assessment of thirty to seventy taels a head.179 Fang's calculation only speaks to the trade between the Dali and the Song kingdoms, since it excludes the trade in Sichuan and exchanges of other items. In addition, the number of horses in some years doubled the state quota.

101In 1253, the Mongols conquered the Dali Kingdom, which probably marked the end of the horse trade.180 The lack of horses may have contributed to the Song's failure, though it is hard to know exactly what influence it had. But we do know for a fact that horses from Yunnan were crucial to Song China's defense and had positive effects on Southern Song's occasional military successes. Yue Fei, the famous general who defeated the Jin cavalry several times, did have horses from Yunnan in his army.181 On the other hand, the horse trade was also significant to the Dali Kingdom on the grounds that many substantial items as well as luxuries were exchanged.

102Yunnan horses were not only exported to China but also to mainland Southeast Asia. Jiaozhi and Zhancheng were two local regimes around today's Vietnam and they often fought one another. They both produced horses that were too short for war use. At first, they were dependent on the Song horses, many of which indeed migrated from Dali. The Song, exhausted by the northern fights, tried to keep the two southern regimes balanced in order to avoid the emergence of a dominant power that could be another troublemaker. To achieve this goal, the Song controlled the quality of horse export,182 but Jiaozhi eventually managed to acquire more horses and so won the game. In fact, horses in both Jiaozhi and Zhancheng were mainly from the Dali Kingdom, directly or via the Song. Almost at the same time, the Song cavalry put down a rebellion led by Nong Zhigao in Guangxi. These circumstances contributed to the spread of cavalry in eastern mainland Southeast Asia, and also the spread of horses from Yunnan, and in this way they shaped local power struggles and demonstrated their significance.183 In short, it may not be an exaggeration to conclude that horses from Yunnan to some extent shaped power struggles east of the Himalayas. Ranabir Chakravarti's study on the horse trade in early Bengal also shows how horses from Yunnan affected Indian states.184

103Like many other parts of India, Bengal in ancient and early medieval times did not have any indigenous, good-quality warhorses. The emergence of regional political entities in Bengal such as the Palas (c. 750–1175) and the Senas (c. 1096–1225) during the early medieval times (c. 600–1300) must have increased the demand for warhorses. The northern quarter of Bengal, sometimes referred to as Uttarapatha, had its traditional supply of horses that provided the Palas, the premier regional power in eastern India, with fine warhorses. The Sena Kingdom, which succeeded the Palas as the most powerful ruling house in early medieval Bengal and Bihar, also highly valued horses, as reflected by the title asvapati (lord of horses) that the ruler assumed, along with gajapati (lord of elephants) and marapati (lord of men).

104When identifying Tatatri and Bakadasti, horses from north and northwest and hill-dwelling horses from Bhutan or Tibet, branded as the kohi variety, Ranabir notes that Yunnan was another source of hill-dwelling horses, as Marco Polo observed. Marco Polo was aware of the excellent and strong horses in Yunnan. He said that Amu "produces many horses and oxen, which are sold to merchants, and conveyed to India" with a forty-five day journey through Pagan and Bengal.185 Amu was probably somewhere in what is today southern Yunnan.

105But Bengal was not the only destination of the horse trade; in fact Bengal was a transit center. Horses, after arriving in Bengal, were transferred to eastern Deccan and China. Chinese sources documented no fewer than fourteen tributary missions from the Bengal Sultanate to China. In those tributary lists, horses were the costliest of all the gifts.186 Moreover, Ranabir traces the horse trade in Bengal to the third century and concludes that in both the third century and the post-1200 period, horses were brought to Bengal from elsewhere (including Yunnan) and then a number of them were exported as an item of maritime trade. It is certainly not a coincidence that the ages he discusses concur with the time of the horse trade in Yunnan; in the medieval ages especially, a large number of horses from Yunnan were exported to Song China. Although we know neither how many horses were traded into the Bengal area from Yunnan, nor how they were compared with those from Tibet and northwestern frontiers, it is enough to make the conclusion that horses from Yunnan had a significant role to play in Indian societies.

Three Silk Roads: Network of Eurasian Communication

106While the SSR shaped local societies, as revealed by the horse trade, the role of the SSR in fact was far more than local. I argue that the SSR and the other two Silk Roads supplementarily maintained and developed interactions between the West and the East.

107Scholars of Southwest China have not only demonstrated that the SSR was one of the vehicles of three major Sino-foreign communications, but they have also begun to realize the close connections of the three Silk Roads. Indeed, a few have argued that the three roads constituted a world network. Shen Xu, for example, pointed out that "the Southwestern Overland Silk Route was one of the three main passages by which ancient China made contacts with the outside world, and served as a link that connected the Maritime Silk Road and the Northern Overland Silk Route, thus forming an integrated network system of China's trade, communications, and cultural flow with the outside world."187 If we examine coastal mainland Southeast Asia, we can argue that the overland routes worked mutually. The same argument can be made about the interactions between the North Silk Road and the SSR.

108Starting from Yunnan or from Chengdu (Sichuan), the SSR either could go northward by internal highways to Chang'an, the first city of the North Silk Road,188 or it could go northwestward, entering the Western Region; or it could enter Tibet. Tibet, indeed, was an interaction zone, connecting the Western Region, the Central Plain, Southeast Asia, and South Asia.189 Winding south, the SSR could enter India, either directly or through the Maritime Silk Road, and then go northward, joining the Silk Road. Although these three roads were connected in many ways, in the eyes of local peoples, for example, the people in northern India, mainland Southeast Asia, Sichuan, and Tibet, it made no sense to talk about the conjunction of the two Silk Roads: there was definitely only one road. Therefore, we can argue that the three Silk Roads constituted a network that enabled communications within Eurasia.

109Geographically, the three roads constituted parallel passages within Eurasia. From north to south, the three roads went through and penetrated the continent, with their sub-branches crisscrossing it. It seems that overland roads emerged earlier than the overseas route. Although we do not know which overland road came into being first, the North Silk Road had obviously contributed much more activity in the beginning. However, the wars around Central Asia sometimes blocked the trade, and merchants then turned to the SSR and the Maritime Silk Road. Many tributary missions were recorded through either the Maritime Silk Road or the SSR in the first century when the Eastern Han lost its control over the Western Region, solid evidence of the shift. It is not by chance that the first mission from the Roman Empire arrived in China not from the north, but from the south. Since the Tang Dynasty, the Maritime Silk Road had been a major channel of communication, while the SSR developed at the same time. By the time the North Silk Road declined, after the collapse of the Mongol Empire, the Maritime Silk Road was already a major passage. Still, the SSR should not be underestimated. The expansion of the Ming and Qing empires into Southeast Asia was a major state project, as revealed by many tributary missions from Southeast Asia. Finally, when Europeans colonized Southeast Asia, trade in the SSR reached an unprecedented volume.

110Many cultural influences arrived along the three roads, such as silk, paper and papermaking, gunpowder, and Buddhism, to list a few. It was commonly accepted that Buddhism came earliest through the North Silk Road and then through the Maritime Silk Road, even if some scholars claim that either the Maritime Silk Road or the SSR deserves the credit. Indeed, it seems that all the three passages contributed to this cultural migration.

111The spread of Buddhism was a powerful symbol of Sino-Indian interaction and the existence of Buddhist sutras in China is illustrative. There are five types of Buddhist sutras found in China: sutras in Chinese; sutras in Tibetan or Mongolian languages; sutras found in Xinjiang (the Western Region) in ancient local languages; pattra sutras (beiyejing) written by the Tai people in Yunnan; and last, sutras found in Tibet or Xinjiang in ancient Indian languages.190 The diversity of Buddhist sutras sheds some light on their various sources.

112Let us look at how Chinese and Indian monks came and went. Chinese monks took the Western Region, Tibet, Yunnan, or South China Sea road to India, whereby all three passages were used. When Yijing visited India, he discovered that a monastery had been built to honor over twenty Chinese monks who had arrived there through Yunnan. Indian monks also traveled via Upper Burma to visit China. During the late Nanzhao reign, Buddhism was widely accepted and took the place of Daoism as the state religion. Many Indian monks reportedly contributed to this transformation. Eight kings of the Dali regime gave up the throne and spent the rest of their lives as monks. Around the turn of the thirteenth century, Zhikong, an Indian monk, arrived in Yunnan, visited China, and stayed in Korea.191

113 Map 2.3 The Southwest Silk Road in the Yuan-Ming-Qing Period Yunnan's religious diversity was also illustrative of its multiculturalism. Taoism, Confucianism, Islam, Christianity, and Buddhism were all present in Yunnan. Even local Buddhist presence shows a great deal of complexity. The presence of Theravada in southern Yunnan, Tibetan Buddhism in northwestern Yunnan, Tantric Buddhism in the Erhai area, and Chinese Buddhism practiced by the Han people demonstrate the different sources and sects of Buddhism in such a small area.

114The spread of paper and paper manufacturing will also throw light on how the three passages jointly functioned. As Chinese and Arabic travelers observed, before the introduction of paper, the Indians used bhurja (Baetula bhojpattr), or cotton clothing, or parchments, or tada-tala (Borassus flabelliformis) to write. Partially because of the inconvenience of obtaining writing materials, monks frequently taught their disciples orally. Most Buddhist scriptures taken into China by Chinese monks such as Xuanzang were on pattra, called beiyejing by the Chinese people. When these scriptures were translated into Chinese, they were written on paper.192 In the mid-second century, paper was used in the Western Region. Written languages from this period include Chinese, Greek, Persian, Sogdian, and Sanskrit. Based on Chinese textual documents, Ji Xianlin concludes that even before the end of seventh century, paper had been used in India (although paper manufacturing arrived there a little later).193

115Ji's discussion is based on archaeological findings in the Western Region, which seemed to imply that paper and paper manufacturers spread to India via the North Silk Road. However, Ji does not specify when exactly the spread of paper to India started. Could it have been earlier than the second half of the seventh century? And could paper have spread to India by way of the sea?

116Huang Shengzhang points out that Xuanzang, who had extensive knowledge of India, never mentioned paper throughout his nineteen-year stay in India (626–645). Therefore, paper must have permeated India only after his stay. During the mid-seventh century a new road connecting China and India was created, the Tibet-Nepal road (Tubonipoluo dao), thanks to the royal marriages among Nepal, Tibet, and Tang. The marriage of Bri-btsum, the Nepalese princess, to Sron-btsan-sgampo in 639 was followed by the arrival of Princess Wencheng two years later from the Tang court. These political marriages embodied and in turn enhanced communications via Tibet. Another two years later (643), Li Yibiao and Wang Ce, Tang China's envoys, took this route to arrive in Magadha. In 665, Xuanzao, a Chinese pilgrim, embarked on the same route but was unable to return because it was blocked by local tribes in Qinghai. In the year 674, Xuanzao met Yijing in India. These documents led to the speculation that, around 650, the paper industry had spread into Tibet. Huang Shengzhang believed so because, in 649, Tang China approved Tibet's request of all kinds of smiths, one of which must have been a papersmith.194

117But the question of how paper spread to India was not fully solved. Li Xiaocen has noticed that several different styles of papermaking existed on the Indian subcontinent. The papermaking style popular in India and Nepal was similar to that of Tibet. Another style was popular in Bengal and was similar to that made in inland China, namely, mulberry bark paper (sangpizhi). Li examined the paper industry along the SSR and found out that mulberry-bark paper dominated there. He found the similar styles of papermaking in Yunnan and in Bengal. Hence, he argued that paper manufacturing in Bengal was spread along the SSR.

118While Huang Shengzhang ruled out the contribution of the Maritime Silk Road to the spread of paper manufacturing, some Chinese documents referred to paper in Java, where paper must have traversed if the Maritime Silk Road had been used.195 Therefore, we cannot deny the possibility of paper migration by sea. It is highly possible that all three roads played a role in the spread of paper.

119Gunpowder is another major contribution of ancient Chinese civilization. The spread of gunpowder and paper to the West was crucial to the Industrial Revolution.196 The Mongol conquest was credited with the presence of gunpowder in the Middle East, Northwest India, and Europe,197 but what about Southeast Asia and south India? Scholars have speculated the interactions between overseas and overland routes, and such interactions have been partially illustrated by Sun Laichen's work on the spread of military technology during the Ming period.198 Ming China experienced a "military revolution" that helped its expansion into Southeast Asia. The Ming's military campaigns and trades immediately spread the knowledge of firearms into "the Maw Shans, Lan Na, and Dai Viet from the end of the fourteenth century, over 120 years before the arrival of European firearms in 1511."199 Here again we see the cooperative contribution of the three Silk Roads.

120Finally, three coinciding events more or less enhanced the significance of Yunnan and the network of the three Silk Roads: One is the bubonic plague, or the Black Death, which decimated people in Eurasia; another is the arrival of Marco Polo; and the last is Zheng He. Although the disastrous influence of the Mongol expansion is well known, its casualties can by no means be compared with that of the bubonic plague, which itself was probably brought by the Mongol cavalry from Upper Burma and Yunnan.200 Marco Polo was perhaps the only person to travel through all the three passages. Arriving in the Mongol court by the North Silk Road, he was dispatched to Burma, where he experienced the Southwest Silk Road, and finally he took the Maritime Silk Road back home.201 The final actor in the enhanced role of the three Silk Roads was Zheng He. His ancestors were from Central Asia, born in Yunnan as result of the Mongol conquest.202 The Ming conquest took Zheng He to Beijing, where he became a favorite eunuch of Prince Yan, who later usurped the throne and dispatched the Treasure Fleet. Zheng's family once more symbolized the triangle connection among the three passages.

121The above discussion encourages scholars to take seriously the role of the SSR and of Yunnan in Eurasian interactions during both ancient and modern times. The three Silk Roads can be seen as one network that constituted the basic pattern of Eurasian communications in both a historical and geographical sense.

Conclusion

122This chapter illustrates that Yunnan served as a nucleus for cross-regional trade by unifying the so-called Southwest Silk Road. The SSR raises many interesting questions about Yunnan. Why was Yunnan unable to maintain its independence, which Burma, Vietnam, and Thailand managed to do? Why and under what circumstances did Yunnan, a foreign/non-Chinese culture, become part of China?

123Yunnan was intimately associated with Southeast Asia, Tibet, China, and beyond. Hence, a one-sided Chinese interpretation, whether it criticizes Chinese imperialism, or speaks highly of Chinese cultural sophistication, is unable to account for the success of the Chinese incorporation of Yunnan.203 The many connections between Yunnan and other cultures indicates that only a global approach can fully explain China's success, which has been examined up to now only within the confines of national history. The imagined or established and national or regional boundaries to some degree have posed barriers to a full, deep, and dynamic picture of not only our world but also frontier areas such as Yunnan.

124To address the question of why Yunnan was incorporated into China and not one of the other many powers around it, we will first of all look at military campaigns—a precondition for almost all forms of colonization—that have eventually managed to bring Yunnan into China proper.

Notes

Note 1: For example, in his recent dissertation, Sun Laichen has criticized the "maritime mentality" of some previous scholars of Southeast Asia who "have overwhelmingly studied elements coming from China, India, and Europe via the sea." See Sun Laichen, "Ming-Southeast Asian Overland Interactions, 1368–1644," dissertation, University of Michigan, 2000, 7-8. back

Note 2: Fang Guoyu, "Yunnan yu Yindu Miandian zhi Gudai Jiaotong" (Ancient Communications Between Yunnan, Burma, and India) in Works of Fang Guoyu, Vol. 4, ed. Lin Chaomin (Kunming: Yunnan Jiaoyu Chubanshe, 2001), 338-369; Gu Chunfan (Kuo Tsung-fei), "A Brief History of the Trade Routes Between Burma, Indochina and Yunnan," T'ien Hsia Monthly 13, no. 1 (1941): 9-32. back

Note 3: Xia Guangnan, Zhongyinmiandao Jiaotongshi (History of the route among China, Burma, and India) (Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 1948). back

Note 4: Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954), 174. back

Note 5: D. P. Singhal, India and World Civilization, Vol. 1 (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1969), 294 and 422. back

Note 6: Yu Yingshi 1967. Needham's Science and Civilization in China may be another example. See Joseph Needham, Science and Civilization in China, Vol. 5, Part II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974), 237-240. back

Note 7: Sun Laichen has presented a list of studies of this international road, but his list is still not comprehensive; scholars of China have edited a two-volume study of the SSR (1990, 1995), and a bibliography was completed in volume 1. For scholars who are interested, it is better to check both theirs and mine. Jiang Yuxiang, "'Gudai Nanfang Sichouzhilu Zonghe Kaocha' Keti Cankao Shuji Wenzhang Mulu" (A bibliography of the Ancient Southern Silk Road), in Gudai Xi'nan Sichouzhilu Yanjiu (Studies on the ancient Southwestern Silk Road), Vol. 1, ed. Wu Jialun and Jiang Yuxiang (Chengdu: Sichuan Daxue Chubanshe, 1990), 269-274; Jiang Yuxiang, ed., Gudai Xi'nan Sichouzhilu Yanjiu (Studies of the ancient Southwestern Silk Road), Vol. 2 (Chengdu: Sichuandaxue Chubanshe, 1995). back

Note 8: We should probably call the Overland Silk Road the North Silk Road, which would show the geographical locations of the three roads from the north to the south and from the land to the sea. I use this term Southwest Silk Road, because I want to parallel these three roads; however, silk was not one of the major goods on the SSR. back

Note 9: Shen Xu, "Xi'nan Sichouzhilu Gailun" (On the Southwest Silk Road), in Xi'nan Wenhua Yanjiu (Southwest China cultural studies), Vol. 1, Yunnan Social Science Institute (Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Press, 1996), 5; Sun Laichen 2000, 3-4. back

Note 10: Sun Laichen 2000, 3. back

Note 11: Janice Stargardt, "Burma's Economic and Diplomatic Relations with India and China from Medieval Sources," Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 14 (1971): 38-62; Sun Laichen, 2000. back

Note 12: Andrew D. W. Forbes, "The 'Cin-Ho' (Yunnanese Chinese) Caravan Trade with North Thailand During the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries," Journal of Asian History 27 (1987): 3. back

Note 13: The Irrawaddy within Burma is navigable; the section of the Red River in Vietnam as well as a tiny section within Yunnan allow water transportation. back

Note 14: Charles Higham, The Bronze Age of Southwest Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 1. back

Note 15: Zhang Zhongpei, "New Understandings of Chinese Prehistory," in The Golden Age of Chinese Archaeology, ed. Yang Xiaoneng (Washington: National Gallery of Art, 1999), 591-526. For archaeological studies about Yunnan, see Wang Ningsheng, Yunnan Kaogu (Yunnan archaeology) (Kunming: Yunnan Renmin Chubanshe, 1992); Zhang Zengqi, Dianguo yu Dian Wenhua (The Dian Kingdom and the Dian culture) (Kunming: Yunnan Jiaoyu Chubanshe, 1997); Li Kunsheng, Yunnan Kaoguxue Lunji (Selected works of Yunnan archaeology) (Kunming: Yunnan Renmin Chubanshe, 1998); and Tong Enzheng, Nanfang Wenming (The southern civilization) (Chongqing: Chongqing Chubanshe, 1998). back

Note 16: Another examination dates the Yuanmouensis 500,000 to 600,000 years ago, which severely weakens the above hypothesis. See K. C. Chang, The Archaeology of Ancient China, 4th ed. (New Haven, Conn., and London: Yale University Press, 1986), 40. However, scholars of China tested their theory again and insist on their initial conclusion. See Li Kunsheng 1998. back

Note 17: Zhang Zhongpei 1999, 519. For archeology and Chinese nationalism, see Barry Sautman, "Peking Man and the Politics of Paleoanthropological Nationalism in China," Journal of Asian Studies 60, no. 1 (February 2001): 95-124. back

Note 18: Pile building is found in Americas and Europe, too. Thanks to Andre Gunder Frank and Chen Xingcan for mentioning it. back

Note 19: Ling Chunsheng, Zhongguo Bianjiang Minzu yu Huantaipingyang Wenhua (Studies of Chinese minorities and circum-Pacific cultures) (Taibei: Lianjing Chuban Shiye Gongsi, 1979). For the genealogical patronymic linkage system, for instance, see Luo Changpei (Lo Ch'angp'ei), "The Genealogical Patronymic System of the Tibeto-Burman Speaking Tribes," Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 8, no. 3-4 (1945): 349-363. back

Note 20: See Higham 1999. Sun Laichen also has a good argument for putting Yunnan and Assam in Southeast Asia. See Sun 2000. back

Note 21: Fei Xiaotong, "Woguo de Minzushibie" (The minzu identification in our country), Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 1 (1980): 159. In another article, Fei classifies people in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau into six categories: the Tai, Yi, local indigenes, Austronesian, Han migrants, and their hybrids. See Fei Xiaotong, "Zhonghuaminzu de Duoyuanyiti Geju" (Plurality and unity and the Chinese nation), Beijingdaxue Xuebao 4 (1989): 15. back

Note 22: For recent archeological research, see Li Kunsheng 1998; Tzehuey Chiou-Peng, "Western Yunnan and Its Steppe Affinities," in The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Peoples of Eastern Central Asia, ed. Victor H. Mair, Journal of Indo-European Studies monograph series, monograph no. 26 (in two volumes), 1998, 280-304; Tzehuey Chiou-Peng, "Horsemen in the Dian Culture of Yunnan," manuscript. back

Note 23: Tong Enzheng, "Shitan Gudai Sichuan yu Dongnanya Wenming de Guanxi" (A talk on the relation between ancient Sichuan and Southeast Asia civilization), in Gudai Xi'nan Sichouzhilu de Yanjiu (Studies on the ancient Southwest Silk Road) (Chengdu: Sichuan Daxue Chubanshe, 1990), 10-29; and his many other articles in Nanfang Wenming (Chongqing: Chongqing Chubanshe, 1998). back

Note 24: Tao Weiying, Yuenan Gudaishi (Ancient history of Vietnam) (Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe, 1959). Bronzes and jades in Sanxingdui are dated to the late Shang period (c. 1300–1046 BCE?). While they shared similarities with the Shang items, they held their own features. The 1986 excavation of two pits there have led to considerable speculation and many arguments. See Yang Xiaoneng, ed., The Golden Age of Chinese Archaeology (Washington: National Gallery of Art, 1999), 140-141and 206-227. back

Note 25: Higham, 338. back

Note 26: Ibid. back

Note 27: For the origins and spread of bronze drums in Yunnan, see Wang Ningsheng 1992, Tong Enzheng 1998, Zhang Zengqi 1997, and Li Xiaocen 1997. There are many arguments about the origins of bronze drums but they tend to agree, if nationalist sentiment is set aside, that they were first used in Yunnan. Some scholars, however, believe that Vietnam is the home of the bronze drum. For example, see Richard M. Cooler, The Karen Bronze Drums of Burma: Types, Iconography, Manufacture and Use (Leiden, New York: E. J. Brill, 1995). On the other hand, if Yunnan was not the original home, it played a key role in the spread of bronze drums to mainland Southeast Asia, as Cooler believes that the Karen drums were spread from Yunnan. See Cooler 1995, 2. back

Note 28: Li Xiaocen 1997, 56-83. For bronze drums, see, for example, Gudai Tonggu Xueshu Taolunhui Lunwenji (Collected articles of the conference on the ancient bronze drums) (Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe, 1982). back

Note 29: Tzehuey Chiou-Peng, "Note on the Collard Disc-Rings from Bronze Sites in Yunnan," paper presented at the Association for Asian Studies annual meeting (March 27–31, 2003), New York. back

Note 30: Arnold Toynbee, Mankind and Mother Earth (New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1976), 104. Japanese scholars also note the export of copper and tin from Yunnan; see Yoshimi Fujisawa, "Biruma Unnan ruto to tozai bunka no koryu" (the Burma-Yunnan transportation route and the East-West cultural contact: The cultural origins of Nanzhao), Iwate Shigaku Kenkyu 25 (1953): 10-21. back

Note 31: Jin Zhengyao, "Wanshang Zhongyuan Qingtong de Kuangliao Laiyuan Yanjiu" (A study on the bronze sources of the late Shang period in the Central Plain), in Fang Lizhi, ed., Kexueshi Lunji (Works on the history of sciences) (Hefei: Zhongguo Keji Daxue Chubanshe, 1987), 365-386. The Shang seems to have already built a kind of tributary system to exploit neighboring material resources such as salt, bronze, and lead. Bronze ore was mainly obtained from the south (Hubei and Jiangxi). As a result, a kind of world-system that a central-peripheral structure characterized emerged. Lead, for example, was processed in about 1500 BCE before being shipped to the north. See Liu Li and Cheng Xingcan, "Cheng: Xia Shang Shiqi dui Ziranziyuan de Kongzhi Wenti" (Cities: the control of natural resources in the Xia-Shang period), Dongnan Wenhua 3 (2000): 45-60; Liu Li and Cheng Xingcan, "Zhongguo Zaoqi Guojia de Xingcheng" (The formation of early states in China), in Gudai Wenming (Ancient civilization), Vol. 1 (Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe, 2002), 71-134. back

Note 32: Li Xiaocen 1997, 37-45; Tong Enzheng 1997, 270-295. Toynbee, like K. C. Chang in his three early editions of Chinese Archaeology, regarded the Dong Son bronze culture in North Vietnam as dating to an earlier era, so Toynbee excluded the possibility that copper had been processed before it was shipped to the north. However, it has been determined that bronze cultures both in Yunnan and Sichuan were earlier than the Dong Son. Bronzes and jades in the sacrificial pits at Sanxingdui were made by peoples who were not mentioned in any early Chinese text. So far the significance of Sanxingdui is obvious but open to discussion. back

Note 33: Zhang Zengqi 1997; Tzehuey Chiou-Peng also points out how the Di-Qiang cultural elements were indigenized; see Tzehuey Chiou-Peng 1998. back

Note 34: Ling Chunsheng 1979. Many scholars of China regard Dianyue in ancient Yunnan as one of Baiyue spread through Southeast and South China, but Chen Ruxing argues that Dianyue was located in Assam. back

Note 35: Ni He (Ming), Nanzhao Yeshi Huizheng (The wild history of Nanzhao) (Kunming: Yunnan Renmin Chubanshe, 1990), 17-18; 21. back

Note 36: The Bo people were also nicknamed "Baiyi"; however, considering the geographical locations of the nine peoples, the author tends to believe that this Baiyi refers to the Tai people. back

Note 37: The first character of the word should be pronounced as "yan" or "juan," though in most cases it is pronounced as "shen." It is supposed to be a phonetic translation of Indus or Hindus. Previously many Western scholars missed it. back

Note 38: SJ, juan 123, in YNSLCK 1: 10. One li is about a third of a mile, although sometimes in early Chinese texts it was descriptive. back

Note 39: One should bear in mind that, unfortunately, the classification of the four branches is based on the modern administrative unit, which is certainly somewhat problematic for world historians. back

Note 40: See Charles Higham 1999. The discovery of Sanxingdui has been a major contribution to and the demonstration of the plural origin theory of the Chinese civilization that was raised in the 1980s. back

Note 41: For historical communications between China and Vietnam, see, for instance, Chen Yulong, Lidai Zhongyue Jiaotongdaoli Kao (Studies of Sino-Vietnamese routes) (Kaifeng: Henan Renmin Chubanshe, 1987). back

Note 42: For this road, see Fang Guoyu 2001, 4: 370-83; Yan Gengwang, "Hanjin Shidai Dianyue Tongdao Kao" (A study of the communication between Yunnan and Vietnam during the Han and Jin Dynasties), Journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies of the University of Hong Kong 8, no. 1 (1976), 24-38; "Tangdai Dianyue Tongdao Bian" (A study of the communication between Yunnan and Vietnam during the Tang Dynasty), Journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies of the University of Hong Kong 8, no. 1 (1976): 39-50; Paul Pelliot, Jiaoguangyindu Liangdao kao (Deux itineraires de Chine en Inde à la fin du VIIIe Siècle), trans. Feng Chengjun (Beijing: Zhonghuashuju, 1955). back

Note 43: For the records of Yijing and Xuanzang, see Fang Guoyu 2001, 4: 338-369. back

Note 44: Though Man Shu was compiled by Fan Chuo at that time, many of his sources recorded a local society of an earlier period. For discussions, see Fang Guoyu 2001, 2: 367-394. Fan Chuo served in the Annam Protectorate, survived when Nanzhao took over Annam, and recorded what he heard and read, though he did not enter Yunnan himself. back

Note 45: For Jia Dan's record, see Xin Tang Shu (hereafter, XTS), juan 43, in YNSLCK 2: 240. For the discussions of this route, see Pelliot 1955, Yan Gengwang 1976a-1976b, and Fang Guoyu 2001, 2: 657-684; 2001, 4: 338-369. G. H. Luce, a pioneering sinologist in the early twentieth century, has utilized Chinese records to discuss countries/city-states around Burma. See Luce, "Countries Neighboring Burma," Journal of the Burma Research Society 14, Part II (1924): 138-205. back

Note 46: Walter Liebenthal questions why people took the southern winding way to Kalinga instead of traveling for a couple of days by boat. The reason lies in the trade. Travelers, indeed merchants, were driven to seek profit, not the shortcut. Walter Liebenthal, "The Ancient Burma Road—A Legend?" Journal of the Greater India Society 15, no. 1 (1956): 10. back

Note 47: John Deyell, "The China Connection: Problems of Silver Supply in Medieval Bengal," in Money and the Market in India 1100–1700, ed. Sanjay Subrahmanyam (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994), 128. Himansu Bhusan Sarkar also points out the three ways connecting Bengal to China. See Himansu Bhusan Sarkar, "Bengal and Her Overland Routes in India and Beyond," Journal of the Asiatic Society (Calcutta, India) 16 (1974): 105. back

Note 48: Nisar Ahmad, "Assam -Bengal Trade in the Medieval Period: A Numismatic Perspective," Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 33 (1996): 176-177. back

Note 49: Deyell 128. back

Note 50: For discussions, see Feng Hanyong, "Chuanzangxian shi Xi'nan Zuizao Guoji Tongdao Kao" (The Sichuan-Tibet route: The earliest international road in Southwest China), Zhongguo Zangxue 5 (1988): 147-156; Lu Ren, Yunnan Duiwai Jiaotongshi (History of the communications between Yunnan and foreign countries) (Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Press), 1997, 102-104; and Shen Xu 1998. back

Note 51: SJ, juan 123, in YNSLCK 1: 10. back

Note 52: Ji Xianlin, "Zhongguo Cansi Shuru Yindu Wenti de Chubu Yanjiu" (An elementary study of the spread of Chinese silk to India), Lishi Yanjiu 4 (1955): 51-94. back

Note 53: Tzehuey Chiou-Peng 2003, 8: "Archeological data indicate that the trajectory marked by the ancient kettledrums corresponds to routes that had been well blazed by the end of the second millennium BCE as a result of activities related to metal trade dealing with both raw materials and finished products." back

Note 54: Xia Nai (Zuoming), "Woguo Chutu de Shihua de Rouhong Shisuizhu" (Decorated carnelian beads unearthed in our country), Kaogu (Archaeology) 6 (1974): 382-385. Xia was one of the most famous archaeologists in China. back

Note 55: Zhang Zengqi 1997, 289-292. back

Note 56: Liuli refers to transparent or translucent glass. In Chinese literature, there was no clear distinction between liuli and boli (glass). Both words have Sanskrit origins. For discussions, see Liu Xinru, Ancient Indian and Ancient China: Trade and Religious Exchange ad 1–600 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999), 58-63. back

Note 57: Zhang Zengqi 1997, 289-292. back

Note 58: Yu Yingshi 1967, 116-117. back

Note 59: Zhang Zengqi 1997, 293-298. back

Note 60: Michele Pirazzoli-t'Serstevens, "Cowry and Chinese Copper Cash As Prestige Goods in Dian," in Southeast Asian Archaeology 1990: Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, ed. Ian Glover (Center for South-East Asian Studies, University of Hull, 1992), 45-52. back

Note 61: Both Chinese and Western scholars have raised this question. For example, see Schuyler Van R. Cammann, "Archaeological Evidence for Chinese Contacts with India during the Han Dynasty," Sinologica 5, no. 1 (1956), 1-19; and Xia Nai, "Zhongba Youyi de Lishi" (History of Sino-Pakistan friendship), Kaogu 7 (1965), 357-364. back

Note 62: Scholars agree that shubu was not silk, but disagree on what sort of cloth it was. Two opinions have emerged. One refers to huangrun xibu, which was recorded in ancient documents; the other argues that it was made of ramie/China grass (zhuma). For some discussions, see Sang Xiuyun, "Shubu Qiongzhu Chuanzhi Daxia Tujin de Lice" (A study on the road through which shubu and qiongzhu spread to Bactria), in Wu Jialun and Jiang Yuxiang 1990, 175-200; Rao Zongyi, "Shubu yu Cinapatta," Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo Jikan 45, no. 4 (1974), 561-584; and Ren Naiqiang, "Shubu Qiongzhu ru Daxia kao" (Studies of the shubu and qiongzhu in Daxia [Bactria]), in Huayangguozhi Jiaobu Tuzhu (Illustrations and annotations of Huayangguozhi), annotated by Ren Naiqiang (Shanghai: Gujichubanshe, 1987), 323-328. back

Note 63: Xia Nai 1965; ironically, scholars who support the SSR often argue that abundant resources, developed economy, and sophisticated local societies facilitated the long-distance trade while those against emphasize that disadvantageous climate and topography, primitive production and economy, and chaotic local societies made the road impossible before the Qin-Han period. back

Note 64: Xia Nai 1965; Lü Zhaoyi, "Duiyu Xihanshi Zhongyin Jiaoyong de Yidian Kanfan" (A critique on the Sino-Indian communication in the Western Han period), Nanya Yanjiu (Studies of South Asia) 2 (1984): 58-67; Wang Nianqun, "Xihan Zhongye Zhongguo Xi'nan yu Yindu Jiaotong Kao" (A study on the communication between Southwest China and India before the mid-Western Han Dynasty), Nanya Yanjiu (Studies of South Asia) 3 (1998): 58-68, 117. back

Note 65: Lü Zhaoyi 1984; Wang Nianqun 1988. back

Note 66: Wu Zhuo, "Xi'nan Sichouzhilu de Zairenshi" (Rethinking the Southwest Silk Road), Wehshi Zhishi 10 (1998): 19-25. Wu lists both the two roads. back

Note 67: Walter Liebentha 1956; Luo Kaiyu. "Cong Kaogu Zillion Kan Gudai Shu, Zang, Yin de Jiaotonglianxi" (The ancient Sichuan-Tibet-India communication from archaeological sources), in Gudai Xi'nan Sichouzhilu de Yanjiu (Studies on the ancient Southwest Silk Road) (Chengdu: Sichuan Daxue Chubanshe, 1990), 47-60. Luo argues that shubu and qiongzhang entered India through Sichuan and Tibet. back

Note 68: That is why Emperor Wu dispatched four emissaries to locate the road to India, looking not only southwestward but also westward and northwestward. Wu Zhuo uses it to deny the road by asking why envoys were sent westward if the road extended southwestward. I think, however, that it just reveals the fact that the Han did not have much information about Yunnan and the road, whereas the Han did know that India was located somewhere to the west, and that there was a road to the west. See Wu Zhuo 1998. back

Note 69: Cf. Himansu Bhusan Sarkar 1974, 92-93. back

Note 70: Wilfred H. Schoff, trans. and annotated, The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: Travel and Trade in the Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the First Century (London, Bombay, and Calcutta: Longmans, Green, 1912), 47-48; also see G. H. Luce, "The Tan and the Ngai Lao," Journal of the Burma Research Society XIV, Part II (1924): 129. back

Note 71: Wilfred H. Schoff 1912, 255-269. back

Note 72: Fang Guoyu 2001, 4: 350. back

Note 73: Needham 1974, 237. back

Note 74: Needham 1974, 237-240. back

Note 75: W. W. Tarn, The Greeks in Bactria and India, rev. 3rd ed. (Chicago, Ill.: Ares, 1997), 87. back

Note 76: Needham 1974, 237. back

Note 77: Ibid. back

Note 78: Schuyler Van R. Cammann, "Archaeological Evidence for Chinese Contacts with India during the Han Dynasty," Sinologica 5, no. 1 (1956): 5. back

Note 79: Some scholars claim that the actual sources of alloy coins were from Afghanistan, and later either the sources had run out or the shift of governments found impractical to continue the mining. See Cammann 1965, 8. For discussions by P. R China scholars, see, for instance, Li Xiaocen 1997, 84-91. back

Note 80: Cammann 1956, 6. back

Note 81: Zhang Zengqi, Yunnan Yejingshi (History of Yunnan metallurgy) (Kunming: Yunnan Meishu Chubanshe, 2000), 74-75. back

Note 82: Harald Bockman, "Yunnan Trade in Han Times: Transit, Tribute and Trivia," in Asian Trade Routes, ed. Karl Reinhold Haellquist (London: Curzon Press, 1991), 174, 178. back

Note 83: SJ, juan 116, in YNSLCK 1: 5. back

Note 84: SJ, juan 123, in YNSLCK 1: 11. back

Note 85: For the discussion, for instance, see Yu Yingshi 1967, 114-115. back

Note 86: For the arguments, see Rao Zongyi 1974; Wen Jiang, "Dianyuekao" (A Study of the Dianyue State), in Gudai Xi'nansichouzhilu Yanjiu (Studies of the Ancient Southwest Silk Road), ed. Wu Jialun and Jiang Yuxiang 1990, 61-66; Chen Ruxing 1991 and 1992; Luo Erhu, "Hanjin Shiqi de Zhongguo 'Xi'nan Sichouzhilu" (The Southwest Silk Road during the Han-Jin Period), Sichuandaxue Xuebao 1 (2000): 84-105; and He Ping, Cong Yunnan dao Asamu—Tai/Dai Minzu de Lishi Zaikao yu Chonggou (From Yunnan to Assam—a reexamination and construction of the Tai/Dai history) (Kunming: Yunnan Daxue Chubanshe, 2001), 48-71. back

Note 87: Conventionally, Sham or Shan in Chinese pinyin has been thought to be the Shan in ancient Burma, but Chen Ruxing points out that it was Sham, not the Shan state of modern Burma. So far I find his argument convincing. See Chen Ruxing, "Zhubo Kao" (A study of Zhubo), Journal of Southeast Asian Researches 6 (1970): 97-105; He Ping 2001, 72-90. Thanks to Sun Laichen for bringing Chen's works to my attention. back

Note 88: For the above missions, see Hou Han Shu (History of the Eastern Han Dynasty, hereafter HHS), juan 86, in YNSLCK 1: 61-62. back

Note 89: HHS, juan 86, in YNSLCK 1: 62. back

Note 90: Hua Yang Guo Zhi (HYGZ), juan 4, in YNSLCK 1: 260. back

Note 91: Yu Yingshi 1967, 115-117. back

Note 92: Yu Yingshi 1967, 115. back

Note 93: San Guo Zhi (SGZ), juan 30, in YNSLCK 1: 128. back

Note 94: HHS, juan 86, in YNSLCK 1: 60; HYGZ, juan 4, in YNSLCK 1: 260. back

Note 95: HYGZ, juan 4, in YNSLCK 1: 260. back

Note 96: Xu Han Shu, in YNSLCK 1: 50. back

Note 97: HHS, juan 23: 2745. back

Note 98: Lan Yong, Nanfang Sichouzhilu (The Southern Silk Road) (Chongqing: Chongqingdaxue Chubanshe, 1992), 33-34. back

Note 99: Cf. Chen Qian 1981, 170. Chen Qian, "Chuandianmianyin Gudaokao" (On ancient routes among Sichuan, Yunnan, Burma, and India), Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 1 (1981): 161-180. back

Note 100: This route was detailed by Huilin, a monk of the early ninth century. See Fang Guoyu 2001, 4: 353-354. back

Note 101: Fang Hao, Zhongxi Jiaotongshi (History of the East–West communications) (Wuhan: Yuelushushe, 1987), 210-212. back

Note 102: The period was a golden age of mainland Southeast Asia as many prosperous kingdoms and port cites arose. The socioeconomic background needs to be further explored while trade surely played a crucial role. back

Note 103: Fang Guoyu 2001, 2: 230-235; 406-409. Fang has located most of them. For regimes neighboring Burma in early periods see Luce 1924, 138-205. back

Note 104: G. E. Harvey, History of Burma: From the Earliest Times to 10 March, 1824: The Beginning of the English Conquest (London: Frank Cass, 1967), 12-13. back

Note 105: Harvey 1967, 16. back

Note 106: XTS, juan 43, in YNSLCK 2: 240. For discussions, see Huang Shengzhang, "Wendanguo-Laowo Lishidili Xintan" (Historical and geographical exploration of Wendan-Laos), Lishi Yanjiu 5 (1962): 147-171; and William Southworth, "Notes on the Political Geography of Campa in Central Vietnam During the Late Eighth and Early Ninth Centuries A.D.," in Southeast Asian Archaeology 1998, ed. Wibke Lobo and Stefanic Reimann (Hull, England: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Hull, 2000): 241-242. back

Note 107: Man Shu, in YNSLCK 2: 78-82. For the war between the Pyu and Shiziguo, see Nanzhao Yeshi, in YNSLCK 4: 778. Shiziguo in imperial Chinese sources usually refers to Ceylon. Here it might be some regime in the Bengal Bay. back

Note 108: Chen Qian 1981, 171-172; Lu Ren 1997, 162-163. back

Note 109: Man Shu, in YNSLCK, 2: 57-58. For discussions, see Mu Qin, Yunnanzhi Buzhu (Additional annotations to Yunnan Zhi) (Kunming: Yunnan Renmin Chubanshe, 1995); and Lu Ren 1997, 104-116. back

Note 110: Fang Guoyu 2000, 2: 409. back

Note 111: Jiu Tang Shu (Old History of the Tang Dynasty, hereafter JTS), juan 91, in YNSLCK 2: 110. back

Note 112: Tao Weiying 1959. back

Note 113: Pelliot 1955, 5. back

Note 114: Fang Guoyu 2001, 4: 370-383; Yan Gengwang, "Hanjin Shidai Dianyue Tongdao Kao" (A study of the communication between Yunnan and Vietnam during the Han and Jin Dynasties), Journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies of the University of Hong Kong 8, no.1 (1976): 24-38. Shui Jing Zhu (Commentary on river classics) by Li Daoyuan (the early sixth century) was the earliest Chinese geographic works. back

Note 115: For Ma Yuan's report, see YNSLCK 1: 76-78; also see Shui Jing Zhu, in YNSLCK 1: 316. back

Note 116: For Wen Qi, see Hua Yang Guo Zhi, juan 10, in YNSLCK 1: 276. back

Note 117: SGZ, juan 39, 100-101. back

Note 118: HYGZ, juan 4, in YNSLCK 1: 262-263; Fang Guoyu 2001, 4: 372-373. back

Note 119: For overseas trade in Jiaozhi of the Han, see Yu Yingshi 1967 and Wang Gungwu, The Nanhai Trade: The Early History of Chinese Trade in the South China Sea (Singapore: Times Academic Press, 1998). back

Note 120: For discussion of sea trade in Jiaozhi, see Liu Shufen, "Liuchao Nanhai Maoyi de Kaizhan" (Developments of the South Sea trade during the Six Dynasties) Shihuo 15, nos. 9-10 (1986): 379-394; Lu Ren 1997, 38-42. back

Note 121: For example, see SGZ, juan 30, in YNSLCK 1: 128. back

Note 122: Zi Zhi Tong Jian (ZZTJ), juan 234 in YNSLCK 1: 635; Man Shu, in YNSLCK 2: 27, 90. Man Shu indeed stated that it took nearly two months from Dali to Annam. See YNSLCK 2: 90. back

Note 123: Lin Wenxun, "Songdai Xi'nan Diqu de Shima yu Minzu Guanxi" (The horse trade and ethnic relations in Southwest China of the Song Dynasty), Sixiang Zhanxian 2 (1989): 66-72. back

Note 124: Zhou Qufei, Lingwai Daida (Answers to questions concerning out of the Range), juan 3, in YNSLCK 2: 248-249. back

Note 125: Lu Ren 1997, 146-148. back

Note 126: For the communications between Guangdong, Guangxi with the Jiangnan, Annam, Dali, and the South China Sea, see Li Guiying, "Songdai Liangguang Jiaotong Jianshu" (A concise introduction to communication of Guangdong and Guangxi in the Song Dynasty), in Zhongguo Xi'nan Wenhua Yanjiu, Vol. 3 (Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe, 1998), 129-140. back

Note 127: Zhou Qufei, juan 3, in YNSLCK 2: 248. back

Note 128: Man Shu, in YNSLCK 2: 18; For discussions of this branch, see Zhao Lufu , Yunnanzhi Jiaoshi (Annotations of Yunnan Zhi) (Beijing: Zhongguo Shehuikexue Chubanshe, 1985); Mu Qin 1995; Feng Hanyong 1988b; Lu Ren 1997, 102-104; and Shen Xu 1998. back

Note 129: Nanzhao dehuabei, in YNSLCK 2: 379. back

Note 130: ZZTJ 244, in YNSLCK 1: 639. back

Note 131: Man Shu, in YNSLCK 2: 70. back

Note 132: Cf. Shen Xu 1998, 120. back

Note 133: Man Shu, in YNSLCK 2: 64. back

Note 134: For the export of Yunnan tea, for instance, see Lu Ren 1997, 292-294. back

Note 135: For zhanchi in Yunnan, for instance, see Wang Ting, "Yuan Yunnan Xingsheng Zhandao Kaolue" (An examination of the postal station in the Yuan Dynasty), Lishidili Yanjiu 2 (1990) (Fudandaxue Lishidili Yanjiusuo: Fudandaxue Chubanshe, 1990); Fang Guoyu and Lin Chaomin, Makeboluo Xingji Yunnan Shidi Congkao (Historical and geographical studies of Marco Polo's travel in Yunnan) (Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe), 1994. back

Note 136: Jingshi Dadian, in YNSLCK 2: 640-641. back

Note 137: Wang Ting 1990. back

Note 138: For details, see Lan Yong 1992, 104-118; Lu Ren 1997, 177-192. back

Note 139: For details, see Yang Zhengtai, "Mingdai Guonei Jiaotong Luxian Chutan" (Internal routes of the Ming Dynasty), Lishidili 7 (1990), 96-108; Yang Zhengtai, Mingdai Yizhan Kao (Studies on the Ming postal stations) (Shanghai Guji Chubanshe, 1994); Lan Yong 1992, 119-134; Lu Ren 1997, 203-216. back

Note 140: Ming Huidian (Statues of the Ming Dynasty), juan 146, in YNSLCK 3: 741-742. back

Note 141: Lu Ren 1997, 207-208. back

Note 142: Lu Ren 1997, 208. back

Note 143: Lu Ren has listed the triangular official stations in some roads in Yunnan. See Lu Ren 1997, 208-216. back

Note 144: Xinzuan Yunnan Tongzhi, juan 56; Lu Ren 1997, 217. back

Note 145: Ruan Yuan, Yunnan Tongzhi (1835), juan 41, in YNSLCK 11: 796-812. back

Note 146: Yu Yingshi 1967, 30. back

Note 147: Ho Ping-Ti, "Li Yuanyang, Xie Zhaozhe, and Mingdai Yunnan" (Li Yuanyang, Xie Zhaozhe, and Ming Yunnan) in Jinian Li Yan Jiaoshou Congshi Xueshu Huodong Wushi Zhounian Shixue Lunwenji (Collected history essays in honor of the fiftieth anniversary of Professor Li Yan's academic activities), edited by the Department of History, Yunnan University (Kunming: Yunnan University Press, 1992), 364. Whether corn spread through the SSR, however, is still open to question. back

Note 148: For example, see Chiranan Prasertkul 1989. back

Note 149: Warren B. Walsh, "The Yunnan Myth," Far Eastern Quarterly 2, no. 3 (1943): 272-285. back

Note 150: Arthur Purdy Stout, "The Penetration of Yunnan," Bulletin of the Geographical Society of Philadelphia 10, no. 1 (1912): 1-35; John L. Christian, "Trans-Burma Trade Routes to China," Pacific Affairs 13, no. 2 (June, 1940): 173-191. back

Note 151: For example, see Louis Pichon, A Journey to Yunnan in 1892: Trade and Exploration in Tonkin and Southern China (Bangkok: White Lotus, 1999). back

Note 152: H. R. Davies, Yunnan: The Link between India and the Yangtze (New York: Paragon Bk. Gall., 1970). back

Note 153: For the trade of the late nineteenth century, see Andrew D. W. Forbes 1987, and Prasertkul 1989. For the Muslim traders in mainland Southeast Asia, see Andrew Forbes and David Henley, The Haw: Traders of the Golden Triangle (Asia Film House under license from Sollo Development in conjunction with Robroy Management and the Karen Publishing Serves Partnership, 1997). back

Note 154: Ernest G. Heppner, Shanghai Refugee: A Memoir of the World War II Jewish Ghetto (Lincoln, NE; London: University of Nebraska Press, 1993), 45. During World War II, over 10,000 Jewish refugees escaped to Shanghai, after they had been refused asylum by European countries. It might be a coincidence that the Shan states, which neighbored Yunnan, were another proposed shelter for the desperate Jewish refugees. See Elliott, Patricia, The White Umbrella (Bangkok: Post Publishing, 1999), 107. back

Note 155: The Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China are now discussing plans to build a railway that links Singapore and Kunming, Yunnan. This railway, 3,000 km long, would cross seven ASEAN countries, and its investment would amount to U.S.$10 billion. See http://www.zaobao.com/special/forum/pages3/forum_lx060917b.html and http://www.zaobao.com/stock/pages13/china050815a.html (accessed on December 4, 2007). back

Note 156: Tzehuey Chiou-Peng, "Horsemen in the Dian Culture of Yunnan," manuscript, 15. back

Note 157: Pony and mule caravans constituted the major vehicles of long-distance trade, though exactly when the caravan emerged is unclear. back

Note 158: Wang Ningsheng, "Gudai Yunnan de Yangmaye" (Horse husbandry in ancient Yunnan), Sixiang Zhanxian 3 (1980): 34. back

Note 159: SJ, juan 129, in YNSLCK 1: 12. back

Note 160: HHS, juan 86, in YNSLCK 1: 58; HYGZ, juan 4, in YNSLCK 1: 252, 257. back

Note 161: Han Shu (History of the Western Han Dynasty, hereafter HS), juan 95, in YNSLCK 1: 32; HYGZ, juan 4, in YNSLCK 1: 252. back

Note 162: Wang Ningsheng 1980, 35. back

Note 163: Man Shu, in YNSLCK, 2: 85. back

Note 164: Man Shu, in YNSLCK 2: 67; XTS, juan 222, in YNSLCK 1: 388. back

Note 165: Zhou Qufei, in YNSLCK, 2: 252-253. back

Note 166: Cf. Fang Guoyu 2001, 2: 431. back

Note 167: For the role of horse in Chinese history, see H. G. Creel, "The Role of Horse in Chinese History," American Historical Review 70, no. 3 (1965): 647-672. back

Note 168: SGZ, 47: 174-175. back

Note 169: SGZ, 47: 175. back

Note 170: SGZ, 49: 199. back

Note 171: ZZTJ, juan 249, in YNSLCK 1: 640; Man Shu, in YNSLCK 2: 45. back

Note 172: For the horse-tea trade in the Song Dynasty, see Paul Smith, Taxing Heaven's Storehouse: Horses, Bureaucrats, and the Destruction of the Sichuan Tea Industry, 1074–1224 (Cambridge, Mass., and London: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1991). back

Note 173: Creel 1965, 670. Song Shi, juan 198, in YNSLCK 1: 500. back

Note 174: SS, juan 198, in YNSLCK 1: 500. back

Note 175: Marco Polo, The Travels of Marco Polo, ed. by Manuel Komroff (New York: Liveright, 2002), 194. back

Note 176: Lin Wenxun 1989. back

Note 177: Yang's story is recorded in Xu Zizhitongjian Changbian (juan 267). See YNSLCK 2: 244-247. Yang once was housed in Dayunnanyi, a postal inn Fang Guoyu said to be located in Yaozhou (Yaoan), where Yang read a trade route network describing the trade route east to Rongzhou (Yibin, Sichuan), west to Yandu (India), southeast to Jiaozhi (Annam), northeast to Chengdu, north to the Daxueshan (Big Snow Mountains), and south to the sea. Furthermore, mileage was detailed. If true, it illustrates that the trade along the SSR was very familiar to the local people in Yunnan. back

Note 178: Zhou Qufei, in YNSLCK 2: 250. back

Note 179: Fang Guoyu 2001, 2: 450. back

Note 180: For Yunnan horses in the Yuan-Ming-Qing period, see Wang Ningsheng 1980. back

Note 181: Cf. Wang Ningsheng 1980, 37. back

Note 182: Jiang Tianjian, Beisong Shima zhi Yanjiu (A study on the horse trade in the Northern Song) (Taiwan: Guoli Bianyiguan, 1994), 309. back

Note 183: Jiang Tianjian 1994, 309. back

Note 184: Ranabir Chakravarti, "Early Medieval Bengal and the Trade in Horses: A Note," Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 42, no. 2 (1999): 194-221. The following is a summary of his study. back

Note 185: Marco Polo 2002, 210. Scholars held different opinions of where Amu (Aniu) was. Fang Guoyu and Lin Chaomin argue that Amu is today's Tonghai, in southern Yunnan. For discussions, see Fang and Lin 1994. Marco Polo mentioned horses and oxen that had been famous local exports to Sichuan since the Qin-Han period. back

Note 186: Ranabir Chakravarti 1999. back

Note 187: Shen Xu, Zhongguo Xi'nan Duiwaiguanxishi Yanjiu (A study of Southwest China's historical foreign relations) (Kunming: Yunnan Meishu Chubanshe, 1994), in the synopsis (prior to content), but with no page number. back

Note 188: When regarding Chang'an as the starting city, we probably ignore the "internal" trade network in China. But, if examining, the Silk Road, should we not forget the political map? Do we even need the words "internal" or "international" for the pre-nation-state period? back

Note 189: For the Tibetan-foreign routes and trades in the early twentieth century, for instance, see Hatsuo Yamagata, ed., Xizang Tonglan (A comprehensive view of Tibet) (Taibei: Huawenshuju, 1969); for the early medieval ages, see Beckwith 1987 and Zhang Yun, Silu Wenhua: Tubo Juan (The Silk Road cultures: Tibet) (Hangzhou: Zhejiang Renmin Chubanshe, 1995); for the route between Chang'an, Tibet, and Nepal, see Lu Yaoguang 1989. back

Note 190: Jin Kemu, "Santan Bijiao Wehua" (The third talk on comparative cultures), in Wang Shuying, ed., Zhongyin Wenhua Jiaoliu yu Bijiao (Communications and comparisons of the Indian and Chinese civilizations) (Beijing: Huaqiao Chubanshe, 1994), 114-120. back

Note 191: For Zhikong, see YNSLCK 3/254-255; Qi Qingfu, "Zhikong Youdian Jian Zhengxushi Kao "(A study on Zhikong in Yunnan and the building of Zhengxu Monastery), Yunnan Shehuikexue 2 (1995): 88-94; and Xiao Yaohui, "Zhonghan-Hanzhong Zhikong Yanjiu Xueshu Taolunhui Zhongshu" (A summary of Sino-Korean Studies on Zhikong), Yunnan Shehuikexue 4 (1998): 92-94. back

Note 192: Ji Xianlin 1955, 51-94. back

Note 193: Ji Xianlin 1955. back

Note 194: Huang Shengzhang, "Guanyu Zhongguo Zhi he Zaozhifa Chuanru Yinbacidalu de Luxian" (The spread route of paper and papermaking into the subcontinent of India), Lishi Yanjiu 1 (1980): 113-132. back

Note 195: Li Xiaocen, "Zhongguo Zhi he Zaozhifa Chuanru Yinbacidalu de Luxian" (The spread of paper and papermaking to the subcontinent of India), Lishi Yanjiu 2 (1992): 130-133. back

Note 196: For the invention of gunpowder and the spread to the West, see, for instance, Feng Hansheng, "Huoyao de Faxian jiqi Chuanbo" (The discovery and spread of gunpowder), in Feng Hansheng Lunzhu Jicui (Selected works of Feng Hansheng) (Beijing: Zhonghuashuju, 1984), 225-274; "Yisilanjiaoguo wei Huoyao you Zhongguo Chuanru Ouzhou de Qiaoliang" (The Islamic world was the bridge of the spread of gunpowder from China to Europe), in Feng Hansheng Lunzhu Jicui (Selected works of Feng Hansheng) (Beijing: Zhonghuashuju, 1984), 275-326; Iqtidar Alam Khan, "Coming of Gunpowder to the Islamic World and North India: Spot on the Role of the Mongols," Journal of Asian History 30.1 (1996) 27-45. back

Note 197: Sun Laichen 2000, 28. back

Note 198: Sun Laichen 2000, 28-76. back

Note 199: Sun Laichen 2000, 75. back

Note 200: For this hypothesis, see William McNeill, Plagues and People (New York: Anchor Press, 1976), 160-164. back

Note 201: For Marco Polo's travel along the SSR, see Fang Guoyu and Lin Chaomin 1994. back

Note 202: Interestingly, Owen Lattimore cautiously concluded that the Yunnan Muslim "may have derived originally from the maritime spread of the Arabs to Southeast Asia, rather than from the penetration of Islam through Central Asia." See Lattimore 1962, 182, note 44. back

Note 203: For critics of incorporation, see Thomas Hall, "Incorporation in the World-System: Toward a Critique," American Sociological Review 51 (1986): 390-402. back